The Corner

A Sonnet in the Morning

Just a couple arising from the weekend’s Radio Derb broadcast.

• I am guilty of having retailed an urban legend: the one that says Texas has, unlike any other state, a legal right to secede from the Union. Explains one listener:

Your statement that TX has a legal right to secede is incorrect. Despite being often repeated, even by the governor of the state, it is just not true.

I researched it in detail once, and read all the treaties, ordinances, resolutions, etc. involved. It seemed reasonable to me that TX would have demanded such a provision. None of the documents mention anything about such a right. TX does, however, unlike any other state, have the right to split itself into up to five states, if Congress agrees. But then they wouldn’t be TX anymore, would they?

In fact, the Supreme Court case that determined secession by any state is unconstitutional and void involved Texas.

Hmph. I heard it from a well-educated Texan and took it on faith. Last time I do that.

• I had this to say about John Boehner’s hyperactive tear ducts:#more#

And since no-one else has said the following thing, I’ll say it. Boehner’s repeated displays of public blubbing are unsightly, undignified, and unmanly. What on earth must the world think, seeing a grown man sniveling and dabbing his eyes on becoming Speaker — third in the chain of command under the President and Vice-President? For crying out loud, Mr. Speaker … no, as you were: for goodness’ sake, Mr. Speaker, this is the Congress of the United States of America, not a twelve-step program for compulsive tanners. Show a little Republican gravitas . . .

The sheer embarrassing unsightliness of the thing aside, all this weeping betrays a poorly developed sense of proportion. If you burst into tears when Nancy Pelosi hands you the Speaker’s gavel, what do you have left when our enemies nuke Indianapolis, or the dollar is trading at par with the Laotian kip, or your wife leaves you, or the doctor tells you you have terminal cancer?

Other pundits, ever attentive to the lead given by Radio Derb, have come out in agreement, notably Andrea Peyser in America’s Newspaper of Record this morning:

His tears are as undignified as they are unseemly. The wet stuff may be viewed on the world stage as a sign of weakness or lack of seriousness. Not to mention his crying is a tad gross … Tears are for girls, girly-boys and folks on the verge of a nervous breakdown. Get a grip.

Ms. Peyser also made the point I made: that if you tear up over every little thing, you have nothing left for the big things. She: “Another observer pointed out that Boehner’s tears are not spurred by tragedy or terrorist attack …”

There is a contrary point of view: the one that says tears are for the small stuff, or at any rate the medium stuff, while great calamities call for stony stoicism. Elizabeth Barrett Browning expressed this in a very lovely sonnet, which fortunately is out of copyright:

I tell you, hopeless grief is passionless —

    That only men incredulous of despair,

    Half-taught in anguish, through the midnight air,

Beat upward to God’s throne in loud access

Of shrieking and reproach. Full desertness

    In souls, as countries, lieth silent-bare

    Under the blanching, vertical eye-glare

Of the absolute Heavens. Deep-hearted man, express

Grief for thy Dead in silence like to death;

    Most like a monumental statue set

    In everlasting watch and moveless woe

Till itself crumble to the dust beneath.

Touch it; the marble eyelids are not wet —

If it could weep, it could arise and go.

A fine reflection on private emotion; but tears have no place in public life, certainly not from those in positions of national leadership. Boehner’s a big sissy; a girly-man for a girly nation.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More