Spending on Presidential Elections

Over at Mother Jones, David Gilson notes that the cost, in real terms, of winning the presidency has increased dramatically over the years:

Barack Obama spent $730 million getting to the White House in 2008—twice as much as George W. Bush spent 4 years earlier and more than 260 times what Abraham Lincoln spent in his first election (as measured in 2011 dollars).

Seth of Erik Rising doubled down with a chart showing the spending per vote cast, which arguably is a better indicator than real spending. To produce the chart he divided “Gilson’s cost figures by the number of votes cast in each election (as recorded by David Leip).” Here is the result:

Interestingly, with a few noticeable exceptions, the spending per voter is relatively stable over time, in spite of changes made to campaign-finance laws. It would be good to see the spending per eligible voters, but as noted by Seth, the data would be really hard to get for many of these years.

Thanks to Tyler Cowen for the pointer.

Veronique de Rugy — Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

Most Popular

U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More