Spitzer vs. Ryan

The trouble with Eliot Spitzer’s latest attack on the GOP starts in the first paragraph.

Four critical decision points—two past, two still forthcoming—are leading us down a path to fully embracing the disastrous Republican budget framework. The two past moments: last December’s extension of the Bush tax cuts, which eliminated nearly $4 trillion in revenue over the next decade, and last week’s budget agreement, which cut nearly $40 billion mostly from nondefense discretionary spending.

The extension of the Bush tax cuts is estimated to be likely to reduce revenues by $445 billion, not $4 trillion. I think Spitzer is using an estimate of how much revenue the government would lose over ten years if it made those tax cuts permanent. But it didn’t do that.

Ryan’s plan. . . claims falsely to save $1.4 trillion by eliminating health care reform

No. It claims, correctly, that ending Obamacare’s exchange subsidies and Medicaid expansions will save $1.4 trillion.

And yet with all this and the use of impossible economic forecasts—unemployment will be at 3.5 percent by 2015?—he will not balance the budget until 2040!

Ryan has mistakenly used very optimistic projections of the growth effects of his plan to make the case for it, but the plan does not rely on these forecasts to achieve budget balance.

The deficit must be closed with no less than the 33 percent of the total narrowing generated by revenue. This is the threshold sought by the bipartisan Bowles-Simpson Plan and already embraced by a significant number of conservative voices. The 33 percent is actually a low number.

Actually, it’s a high number, compared to successful fiscal consolidations in other countries.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular


Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More