In Spring, White House Worked Against Rubio’s DREAM

It seems likely that we’ll be hearing, from either President Obama himself or from his surrogates, in the days ahead that the decision to grant legal status to young adults currently illegally in the country, wasn’t about politics, but about doing the right thing. But interestingly, as recently as April, the White House was actively working against Senator Marco Rubio’s proposed DREAM Act. From Salon:

 

The Obama White House hates the idea. Last week, presidential advisors Celia Munoz and Valerie Jarrett tried to discourage the dreamers from embracing Rubio’s proposal, saying it put at risk the original DREAM Act, which laid out a specific path to citizenship. According to the Washington Post, they had a meeting with DREAM Act-eligible students in Washington, arguing that “Rubio had not demonstrated he could win support from fellow Republicans and that the president would use his clout to push an immigration plan next year. ”

[DREAM activist Gabby] Pacheco, who attended the meeting, was not impressed with the White House appeal.

“You can’t wait until next year if you’re getting deported this year,” she said.  She described the White House officials as “very strategic” in their opposition to Rubio.

So when there was a potentially viable path to giving these young adults legal status — a path that, admittedly, was so retro it involved letting Congress vote on the matter — the White House did what they could to shut down the potential legislation’s path to success.

Also, it looks like Obama himself thought last year that he couldn’t give young adults illegally here legal status last year, although I don’t have the full context of the question he was asked. From an account of the President’s response from United We Dream:

When Ramos asked a follow-up question about granting formal administrative relief to undocumented youth, Obama was even more forceful: “There are enough laws on the books by Congress that are very clear in terms of how we have to enforce our immigration system that for me to simply, through executive order, ignore those congressional mandates would not conform with my appropriate role as President.” 

Pacheco also said that when DREAMers asked the White House could halt the deportations without Congress’ approval, the White House said that wasn’t in the cards. “The thing that surprised us was they said no,” Pacheco told Salon. “They said, practically, ‘We don’t have the power to do this.’”

Katrina Trinko — Katrina Trinko is a political reporter for National Review. Trinko is also a member of USA TODAY’S Board of Contributors, and her work has been published in various media outlets ...

Most Popular

Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More