The Corner

Street by Street

The math is clear. A UKIP vote of around three percent cost the Conservative party an absolute majority at the last (2010) British general election.  The inroads UKIP has recently been making with former Labour voters complicates the picture somewhat, but  a UKIP vote of very much more than that what the party secured in 2010 will doom the Tories to defeat next year. Optimistic Conservatives point to the fact that UKIP grabbed 16.5 percent of the vote in the EU elections in 2009 only to see that shrink dramatically in the ‘proper’ election the next year. Yes, yes, it’s true that UKIP took 27.5 percent of the vote in this year’s election for the EU parliament, but won’t fear of an increasingly leftwing Labour party bring enough UKIP voters back to the Tory camp in 2015 to save the day?

The answer to that is no, thanks not least to the extraordinarily destructive way in which David Cameron is leading his party (the recent botched ministerial reshuffle is just the latest example), but there is something else at play: UKIP is evolving into something rather more than a Tory party in exile, or, for that matter, a collection of angry scrawls on the ballot paper, and that is likely to mean that a higher percentage of UKIP voters will stick with the party in 2015 than was the case in 2010.

Under the circumstances, this Daily Telegraph piece from earlier this week ought to be the stuff of Tory nightmares. Here’s a key extract:

The party has learned the hard way how first-past-the-post brutally punishes small, new parties with evenly spread support – second place is nothing in our electoral system. The parties’ leaders and key strategists have carefully studied the Liberal Democrats’ successful insurgencies in the 1990s: building strongholds of support at local elections, then using these as springboards for intensive and successful Westminster campaigns. Applying this model has already enabled them to win hundreds of local council seats, and they are now trying to convert this local strength into Westminster representation through intense campaigning.

Lord Ashcroft’s poll provides evidence that this is working. In Thurrock, a must-win ultra-marginal, 31 per cent of voters report having been contacted by Ukip – meaning the supposedly disorganised insurgents are beating both Labour (25 per cent) and the incumbent Conservatives (26 [er cent) in the vital constituency street fight. The story is the same in Thanet South – 18 per cent of voters have already been contacted by Ukip, compared to 11 per cent by Labour and 10 per cent by the Conservatives, while in Great Yarmouth, Ukip are tied with the Conservatives on 16 per cent and ahead of Labour on 14 per cent. The Liberal Democrats have long known that the unglamorous grunt work of door knocks and leaflets is the key to electoral success – now Ukip are applying the same lesson, and with the same results.

The evidence that Ukip are learning how to win at street fighting gives the main parties two big reasons to worry. First, it is clear from the Ashcroft polling that, where they fight hard, Ukip can hurt either party’s local prospects. In both Thurrock and Great Yarmouth, Ukip’s local momentum is hurting Labour – who are underperforming in both seats and could lose two otherwise strong pickup opportunities to Farage’s party. In Thanet South, though, it is the Conservatives who are suffering – a seat which in normal circumstances would be out of reach could fall to Ukip or even to Labour. Secondly, arguments like “vote Nigel, get Ed” or “Vote Nigel, get Dave” simply won’t work in seats where Ukip are ahead or in the fight. Voters presented with this argument on the doorstep will simply reply: “No, I’ve seen the polling. Round here it is vote Nigel, get Nigel.”

Those in Westminster who still think of Ukip as a passing fad need to realise that the street fight has begun in Ukip’s target seats, and the rebels are winning.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More