The Corner

Strong Field, Good Debate

The question probably everyone was ready to have asked — and answered — was the one posed on marital fidelity. Mitt Romney’s latest campaign commercial not so subtly raised the issue as he again promoted his “wife of 46 years” and children. Since all the other candidates remain married to their original spouses, this question might have been a trap for Newt Gingrich, who has been divorced twice and married three times. Each of the other candidates answered before Newt, possibly giving him extra time to think, though it is difficult to imagine he wasn’t prepared for it. Only Gov. Rick Perry made a direct connection between living up to one’s marriage vows and the possibility that one might “cheat his business partner” if he didn’t. The others seemed more forgiving. Rick Santorum said it was a factor in determining one’s character, but not the deciding factor. That sounds about right. By the time it was Newt’s turn, he gave the answer we have heard before about asking God for forgiveness for his mistakes of the past. That ended it and the questioners moved on.

On the Middle East, Gingrich refused to back down from his recent contention that the Palestinians are a modern invention who didn’t have that name until 1977. He is right and it was instructive to many to hear him speak of Palestinian textbooks that contain hatred for Jews. Michele Bachmann added her own evidence to support what Newt said. The others were not as direct and seemed squeamish about stating the obvious.

On the health-care mandate, Bachmann tried to coin a new phrase, repeatedly referring to “Newt Romney” to tie both of them to the Massachusetts health-insurance plan and Gingrich’s former support for a federal insurance mandate, which he said he came to realize was the wrong approach.

All the candidates got in digs at President Obama, but Romney had the best line, saying the president believes in “an entitlement society.”

Gingrich took on Romney’s contention that he has mostly been a businessman, saying that Romney would have been a career politician had he defeated Sen. Ted Kennedy in his 1994 senate race. The comment prompted a few boos, but Romney’s comeback was priceless. He said it was probably true, but it was also equally true that he might have been a professional football player had his desire to play football translated into sufficient skill to have a career in the National Football League.

Some Republicans have called this a “weak field” of candidates. In fact, they are sharp and experienced, and each one brings to the table strong beliefs, at least some of which are good and right. Now if we could just have one candidate who combined the best of each of them. But we can’t. We have to choose. That choosing begins January 3. The Iowa debate should go a long way in helping us choose the right and the best one to become the eventual nominee.

— Cal Thomas is a syndicated columnist, a USA Today columnist, and a Fox News contributor.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More