Law & the Courts

Two Gun Cases the Supreme Court Won’t Hear

There was a lot of action at the Supreme Court yesterday, hidden among which were decisions to take a pass on two Second Amendment cases.

One of them, Peruta v. California, involved that state’s strict standards when it comes to public gun-carrying; applicants for a concealed-carry permit must show “good cause” to the satisfaction of county law enforcement, and open carry is banned almost entirely. The Ninth Circuit upheld the “good cause” requirement as interpreted by the plaintiffs’ local sheriff — the only provision the plaintiffs directly challenged, though they also requested “any further relief as the Court deems just and proper” — and that ruling will now stay in effect in that circuit. Justices Thomas and Gorsuch protested the decision, essentially endorsing the idea that there is a Second Amendment right to carry a gun and saying the Ninth Circuit should not have limited its analysis to the “good cause” requirement, as opposed to the right to carry in general.

That distinction is important. As I noted last month in my piece about concealed-carry reciprocity, it’s hard to argue there’s a right to bear a concealed weapon, because concealed-carry bans have a long history and have typically been upheld against challenges under the Second Amendment and similar state constitutional provisions. There is a good case, however, that open carry is a constitutional right, or at least that states must allow one or the other. The plaintiffs in the case should have more explicitly challenged the regime as a whole rather than focusing on their sheriff’s interpretation of “good cause.”

In the other case, Sessions v. Binderup, the Third Circuit had reached a pro-gun decision, holding that two men convicted of nonviolent misdemeanors had not committed “serious crimes” and could not be barred from gun ownership. (Though misdemeanors under Pennsylvania law, the crimes — corruption of a minor and carrying a handgun without a license — carried long enough potential sentences to be considered “felonies” under the federal law against felon gun possession. Both men ended up paying fines but doing no jail or prison time.) Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor would have heard the case but did not issue an opinion explaining their reasons.

Most Popular

Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More