The Corner

Off With Their Heads!

Frank Schubert writes: “You can’t support gay marriage and claim to be a conservative any more than you can be ‘pro-choice’ on abortion and claim to be a conservative.”

A few thoughts:

1. Mr. Schubert should read Jonah Goldberg more often. Gay marriage and abortion really are not all that similar.

2. Was Mr. Schubert invested at some point with the unilateral power to determine who counts as conservative? Was there some kind of Torquemada-for-a-Day lottery? Did I miss a meeting? Because if we’re punching tickets, I have a list.

3. If our choice is between 1.) a movement that includes Mr. Schubert but excludes Jonah, Dick Cheney, Rob Portman, a few National Review staffers who come to mind, David Koch, Peter Thiel, Deroy Murdock, and 70 percent of the people born after 1980, or 2.) a movement that includes Jonah, Dick Cheney, Rob Portman, a few National Review staffers who come to mind, David Koch, Peter Thiel, Deroy Murdock, and 70 percent of the people born after 1980, but excludes Mr. Schubert — can we take a vote?

For the record, Jonah has written only that he has become more sympathetic toward gay marriage over time; I don’t know if that was intended as a full-on endorsement. But I suppose people who are sympathetic toward gay marriage are out, too.

Gay marriage is somewhere around No. 8,373 on the list of things I care about, as I think I’ve mentioned before, but I think I’d still go with Cheney and Portman and Deroy. The tendency among conservatives to read out those who disagree with them on one issue out of every hundred is tedious and self-defeating, not to mention distasteful.

Mr. Schubert’s post is headlined: “Why gay marriage and conservatism are incompatible,” but he never says why. He only declares, as though from on high, that it is so. 

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More