The Corner

A Theme Park in the Crimea

That the EU’s relentless progress towards an ‘ever closer union’ has hollowed out and distorted the politics of many of the democracies of Western Europe ought by now to be far from news. And nor should the fact that the refusal of the EU’s establishment parties to deviate from eurofederalist orthodoxy (despite the disasters of recent years) has driven some voters to throw their support behind parties at which they once would never have considered even looking. A further twist to this tale has come from the way that the politics of these outsider parties have in turn been themselves been distorted by the seemingly unstoppable encroachments of the European superstate, encroachments that have, however perversely, however wrongly, come to make even Vladimir Putin seem, by comparison, oddly congenial.

The Financial Times has a report on just the latest example of this.

A French populist-conservative politician and investor has agreed to build a historic theme park in the Russian-annexed territory of Crimea together with a patriotic Russian financier who has been linked to pro-Russian insurgents in eastern Ukraine.

The deal between Philippe de Villiers, leader of the eurosceptic Mouvement pour la France party, and Konstantin Malofeev, a key figure in Russian orthodox conservative circles who support expansionist ideologies, is certain to reignite controversy in Europe over supporting a regime the EU is trying to punish with sanctions.

The Crimean government said Mr de Villiers, Mr Malofeev and Sergei Aksyonov, the Moscow-appointed head of the Crimean government, had signed a memorandum of understanding under which Mr de Villiers’ company Puy du Fou International and Mr Malofeev would invest at least Rbs4bn ($110m) in the park.

Legal experts in Moscow said Mr de Villiers’ planned Crimean venture constituted an open defiance of EU sanctions. Both Mr Malofeev and Mr Aksyonov are blacklisted under EU sanctions against individuals helping or supporting Moscow’s annexation of Crimea.

Under the regulation, EU citizens are barred from making any funds or economic resources available to a blacklisted individual. In addition, the EU has also banned technical and financial assistance for projects in Crimea and joint ventures in transport, energy and telecommunications on the peninsula.

“Even if the Crimea-specific provision does not apply to a theme park, which is not entirely clear, the one regarding the blacklist does – an EU person cannot do any business with these people, full stop,” said a foreign lawyer in Moscow. He said there was “no way” the planned theme park could go ahead under the EU sanctions, but added that the agreement was just a memorandum of understanding, there might be no legal consequences for Mr de Villiers yet. “This is just a gigantic PR stunt,” he said.

In a press release, Mr de Villiers did not mention EU restrictions but instead expressed his hope that the project would not be blocked by US sanctions.

“Sanctions are acts of war. Co-operation is an act of peace. We have come to deliver an act of peace,” he said in the release. He added: “The future of Europe is not written on the American continent. It is written on the European continent. Europe has no future without Russia.”

Mr de Villiers, a former communications minister in the government of Jacques Chirac, is a well-known conservative who opposes the EU and, more recently, has spoken out against Islam in France….

Those with long memories may recall that the EU was meant to reinforce the political stability of Europe. That it is now, however inadvertently, helping Putin find some sort of opening in the West is just the latest reminder of how badly matters have gone awry.  

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More