The Corner

There’s Not 218

In our editorial today, we recommend the House taking up a package of spending cuts and pairing it with an increase to the debt limit. This seems like a no-brainer. It would give Republicans the initiative and effectively say to the White House and the Senate Democrats — “We’ve dealt responsibly with the debt limit and with the underlying debt, now over to you.”

Despite the panic of the last 24 hours, it’s not true that Obama has all the leverage in the debt-limit debate. It looks to me that he would like a deal with some spending cuts to try to repair his fiscal credentials. Certainly, he and Harry Reid would be put in a very awkward spot after the talk of a catastrophe coming August 2 if they have no counter at all to action in the House to raise the debt limit.

Now, it’s unlikely the House package would ultimately be adopted in its entirety. Normally in such circumstances, House members fear getting “BTU’ed” — putting themselves on record for politically difficult measures that won’t ultimately happen. But this shouldn’t be a problem since the House Republicans already voted for the Ryan plan. The Ryan budget cuts about $6 trillion total over 10 years, and about $2 trillion from non-security discretionary — and that leaves the longer-term Medicare reforms aside. It should be easy just to work from the discretionary part of what they already voted for and pair it with a comparable increase in the debt limit for a 1:1 ratio of spending cuts to debt increase. Or, they could be more ambitious and make it a 2:1 or 3:1 package. Whatever, but there should be lots of options.

Instead, at the moment, there are no options. By all accounts,  several dozen Republicans are opposed to voting for any increase in the debt limit at all. This means Republicans don’t have 218 for anything. A friend of mine jokes, “I don’t think they even have 200 for anything.” This is why the only viable scenario right now for getting something through the House is a deal with the White House that most Republicans and a contingent of Democrats can support. Since that seems unlikely, it looks like we’re going to tick steadily down to August 2.

It may take some sort of disruption in the markets or in the operations of government to shake something lose. If that’s where we end up, who do you think will be blamed? If Republicans do take the blame, they’ll eventually crack and vote for a debt-limit increase in the worst possible circumstances. It’d be much better if they took the initiative now in a bid to avoid ending up in that fix or, if it comes to that, to place the blame on the Democrats. But they’re frozen in place by their own divisions.

Rich Lowry — Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. He can be reached via email: 

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More