The Corner

Time to Teach Stockman a Lesson (Again)

The great American wit Will Rogers once said, “I’m not a member of any organized political party, I’m a Democrat.” These days, Republicans might say the same thing.

Political parties are always evolving, or dying. The Republican party is evolving in many ways best left for others to describe, but in the realm of fiscal policy, the two dominant wings that have waxed and waned for decades are once again battling for ascendancy. On one side are the “tax collectors for the welfare state,” as former House speaker Newt Gingrich once called former Senate majority leader Bob Dole. David Stockman, Reagan’s first budget director, recently wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times reaffirming his place in this tattered wing.

Unlike their tax-hiking cousins in the Democratic party, it’s not that Stockman’s tax-collector wing likes higher taxes. They probably don’t. But they are always ready to put up a fight for show and then do the responsible, bipartisan thing by caving to whatever higher taxes the other side demands. Most of the tax-collector wing lacks Stockman’s courage to state their beliefs, but they can be found out easily enough — they’re the ones who regularly support higher spending, waffle on tax relief, and then mouth support for toothless budget reforms and phony balanced-budget amendments.

Stockman asserts we need to allow the 2001/2003 tax relief to lapse at the end of the year, imposing the largest tax hike in American history by far while the unemployment rate nears 10 percent. He argues the tax relief must lapse because our near-term deficits are unaffordable and the medium- and long-run pictures are worse. Stockman’s assessment of the deficit is entirely correct, but his remedy is, well, consistent with past behavior. Reagan had to take Stockman to the woodshed before firing him because of his tax-collector allegiances.

Government spending has long been too high, rose under Bush, and has soared under Obama. The solution is simple enough — slash the spending. But, in tax-collector world, cutting spending is too difficult and, after all, some of this spending is really, really important. So taxpayers just have to cough it up, but we’re really, really sorry.

On the other side of the party is the taxpayer-protector wing — folks (author included) who say they want to keep taxes and tax rates low, and really mean it. Their foundational belief was captured succinctly by Indiana governor Mitch Daniels: Never take a dollar from a free citizen through the coercion of taxation without a very legitimate purpose.

Contrary to caricatures from inside and outside the Republican party, in championing lower tax rates the taxpayer-protector wing cares little about the rich or corporations. The rich and corporations can take care of themselves very nicely, thank you. The taxpayer-protector wing supports lower tax rates because lower rates permits job growth and higher wages through the unshackled products of rewarded hard work leavened by the American entrepreneurial spirit.

Lower tax rates and a smaller government soared to prominence as a meaningful political doctrine in the modern age with Jack Kemp and Ronald Reagan, lapsed a bit under Bush senior, came to the fore again with Bush junior (despite the excessive spending), and is now looking for a national-level champion. It is the point of view that animates the Republican party and that has gone quiet whenever Republicans lose their way.

In short, within the Republican party there are tax collectors and taxpayer protectors. The former reflect a pale, minority, defeatist world view. The latter, the taxpayer protectors, are literally the life of the party.

J. D. Foster is the Norman B. Ture senior fellow in the economics of fiscal policy at the Heritage Foundation.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More