The Corner

TNR Ignores Pro-Life History

On Tuesday, Ramesh Ponnuru did a fine job refuting many of the arguments Christine Stansell made in her recent New Republic article about the politics of abortion. The New Republic sometimes offers interesting insights and commentary about the national political scene. However, Stansell’s unhinged attack on the Susan B. Anthony List is something one would expect from a NOW or NARAL publication. 

There are a couple additional points worth mentioning here. First, throughout her article, Stansell fails to realize that sometimes things change. It is probably fair to say that the pro-life movement has become more active since the 1980s. However, since the 1980s, the pro-life position has made significant gains in terms of public support. And the political scene reflects this. The pro-choice governors who were once thought to be the future of the Republican party (Whitman, Weld, Wilson) have vanished from the political scene. Additionally, when Arlen Specter sought the Republican nomination for president in 1996, he unapologetically made his pro-choice stance a key selling point. No Republican candidate attempted something similar in 2000, 2008, or 2012. 

Additionally, Democrats have made some efforts to reach out to pro-life voters. Neither Barack Obama nor John Kerry even mentioned support for legal abortion during their respective acceptance speeches at the 2004 and 2008 Democratic convention. When asked about abortion, President Obama seems dodgy and evasive. Instead of presenting the pro-choice position in a shrill, uncompromising way, he usually talks about the need to reduce abortion and ways of finding common ground. Furthermore, many Democrats have (unpersuasively) made the argument that more generous welfare programs are an effective strategy for reducing abortion.

Considering the gains that pro-lifers have made in the court of public opinion, it is unsurprising that pro-life groups are becoming more aggressive. That having been said, most of the items in the Susan B. Anthony List pledge are consistent with longstanding goals of the pro-life movement. After all, pro-lifers have always wanted presidents to appoint pro-lifers to executive branch agencies and nominate judges who would overturn Roe v. Wade. The Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act is a relatively new issue. However, it is safe to say that most Americans oppose late-term abortions. Finally, the LiveAction videos which have caught Planned Parenthood employees engaged in a range of misdeeds have given momentum to efforts to defund Planned Parenthood.

Stansell ends her article by dismissing what she considers the pro-life “pseudohistory” of the feminist movement. She suggests that the important history is that of the pro-life takeover of the Republican party.  However, there is another history that Stansell chose to ignore. When the National Organization for Women (NOW) was founded in 1966, it was in favor of abortion rights. However, support for abortion was a relatively low priority. NOW was primarily concerned with workplace discrimination and expanding opportunities for women. It was not until the late 1960s when Larry Lader and others involved with Zero Population Growth convinced feminist groups to make support for legal abortion a top priority.

Since that time, the feminist movement in the United States has become wedded to abortion rights. Furthermore, the leadership of the Democratic party has gone to tremendous lengths to block even modest restrictions on abortion. A Democratic president vetoed a ban on partial-birth abortion. Senate Democrats have filibustered Republican judicial nominees who would have very likely received majority support. However, considering the shrill tone of her article, it is unsurprising that this history fails to receive a mention from Stansell.

— Michael J. New is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at The University of Alabama and a Fellow at The Witherspoon Institute in Princeton, N.J.

Michael J. New — Michael J. New is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Michigan–Dearborn and an associate scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute in Washington, D.C. He received a ...

Most Popular


Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his editor, I’m going to have to keep this short. I’ve spent most of every day this week in a studio recording the audiobook version of my dead-tree/pixel ... Read More

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More

Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian

Asked in 1972 if he believed in miracles, Billy Graham answered: Yes, Jesus performed some and there are many "miracles around us today, including television and airplanes." Graham was no theologian. Neither was he a prophet. Jesus said "a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Prophets take adversarial ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More