Politics & Policy

The Corner

Time for a Palate Cleanser

If any of you have gotten exhausted trying to counter left’s continual lying about President Trump’s immigration policy, perhaps we need a change of subject. So let’s talk about the left’s continual lying about The Trump administration’s views on climate policy.

This is particularly relevant now that a former advisor considered close to the President’s team– The Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Myron Ebell, suggested today that the President will “definitely” pull out of the UN’s Paris Climate Accord.

Again and again we’ve heard hysterical commentary from the left and the media (but I repeat myself) about Trump’s supposed team of “Climate deniers”.  Let’s set aside that the word “denier” is religious language that should have no room in a debate about facts and policies.  Let’s just examine this claim on its own terms.  

My friend Sarah Hunt over at the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC ) has put together a dossier of what Trump’s cabinet appointees actually said about climate change during their confirmation  hearings.

She’s got quotes from Scott Pruitt (EPA), Ryan Zinke (Interior), Rick Perry (Energy), Rex Tillerson (State) and even Jeff Sessions (Attorney General). And it turns out, that, if the phrase has any meaning at all, none could be cast as “climate deniers”.  In their testimony, all acknowledged the existence of anthropogenic climate change and all acknowledged that humans have a role in causing it.

Some, most famously oilman Rex Tillerson, have actually advocated for a revenue-neutral carbon tax. (rebated by reducing other taxes) to replace what Tillerson has called “hodge podge of current, largely ineffective regulations.” This “radical” position is probably one endorsed by many environmental economists on both the left and right.

Hunt’s first sentence nails the problem exactly:

To the environmental Left, “climate denial” is not about whether or not one thinks anthropogenic climate change is occurring. Rather, it is about whether or not one agrees with their proposed government-expanding policy “solutions” 

That’s exactly correct—and that has always been the problem.   It’s not at all inconsistent to believe that climate change is an issue worth addressing but to think that the UN process is hopelessly corrupted, brings the wrong players into the room, and, through its elevation of moral preening and grandstanding in attacks on countries such as the U.S., does more to exacerbate the political problems on climate change than it does to solve them.

It’s not at all inconsistent to think climate change is an issue worth addressing and yet to want the government to avoid Solyndra-style taxpayer boondoggles.

It’s not inconsistent to think climate change is an issue worth addressing and yet wonder whether the almost $1 Trillion spent  globally on clean energy investment globally over the last three years is being spent wisely.  

It is not at all inconsistent to think that climate change is worth addressing and yet to think that most of the way the left deals with climate change has far more to do with virtue-signaling, Republican-bashing. and rank hypocrisy than it does with actually addressing the climate issue in a meaningful way.

While I’m sure that President Trump’s appointees have a variety of different views about how to best address climate change, and while there are no doubt climate skeptics in the GOP, that doesn’t accurately describe any of the key personnel Trump has charged with dealing with the climate issue.  Maybe Big Green should stop lying about Trump’s cabinet nominees.  If they did, they might find this administration would be more receptive to their concerns.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More