The Corner

Undermining the Peace Process Should Come at a Cost


Today, the United Nations General Assembly will reportedly vote to change the status of the Palestinian Mission. It will become a “state” with observer status, making it essentially equivalent to the Vatican/Holy See. This would violate numerous commitments the Palestinians have made to the Israelis to handle questions of statehood through two-party talks, not through outside groups. If the U.N. takes this step, there should be consequences — for the Palestinians, the U.N., and potentially for all states voting to undermine these commitments.

Thorny status issues can only be resolved when the parties are left to negotiate themselves, uninterrupted by outside interference. Both sides have agreed with that view. The 1995 Oslo II Agreement and the 1998 Wye River Memo prohibit either side from “chang[ing] the status of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.”

Today’s action by the U.N. would violate those agreements. It would place itself between the Israelis and Palestinians in their efforts to resolve these issues themselves. It would do so to the detriment of our steadfast ally Israel. That’s especially disappointing coming so soon after Palestinian terrorists were indiscriminately firing hundreds of rockets at Israeli civilians.

If the U.N. goes ahead with this vote, Congress should consider reducing our financial contributions to the U.N. as well as America’s financial assistance to the Palestinian Authority. Congress should also reevaluate the financial aid we give to any country that undermines the peace negotiations by voting in favor of changing the status of the Palestinian Mission.

Yesterday, I introduced an amendment to the Senate defense bill that makes it clear that undermining the peace process comes at a cost. My amendment will specifically cut 50 percent of the total U.S. funds to the Palestinian Authority and also to any U.N. entity that grants the Palestinians a status change. It also reduces by 20 percent all U.S. foreign assistance to any country voting for the status change.

The Palestinians have a history of trying to use outside groups like the U.N. to skirt the peace process. In 2011, the Palestinians sought membership in UNESCO, and got it. This automatically triggered legal restrictions on U.S. financial support, and the Obama administration was forced to cut aid to UNESCO.

At the beginning of this year, the Obama administration irresponsibly changed course and said that it would try to waive these restrictions. It signaled that the United Nations can continue to undermine that peace process with impunity and raised questions about President Obama’s support for Israel. Today’s U.N. vote is a direct consequence of the administration’s record of mixed signals about the peace process.

A comprehensive and lasting peace between these parties can only come to pass through direct negotiations between the Israelis and the Palestinians. The international community should be united in pushing both sides to the negotiating table, not rewarding one of them for violating previous agreements.

The administration and Congress should make it clear that the path to peace in the Middle East does not run through the United Nations.

John Barrasso, a United States senator from Wyoming, is chairman of Senate Republican Policy Committee

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More