The Corner

Undue Deference

It was only a matter of time until someone labeled judge Royce Lamberth an “activist” for throwing out the Obama administration’s rules on funding embryo-destructive research. William Saletan has decided to be that someone.

He uses NR to make his point. The magazine editorialized against Judge Walker’s “imperiousness” on same-sex marriage but ran an article defending Judge Lamberth on the ground that judges do not owe unlimited deference to other branches’ interpretations of law.

But the truth is that judges don’t owe other branches’ interpretations of the law unlimited deference, and no sound argument for a restrained judicial role assumes that they do. The argument against Judge Walker isn’t that he should have deferred to the understanding of the equal protection clause implicitly adopted by a majority of California voters. It is that his own interpretation of that clause and its implications unjustifiably allows him to substitute his policy views for theirs.

But I’m understating the weakness of Saletan’s case. He notes that Congress has passed bills that clearly conflict with the judge’s conclusion. Those bills are entitled to no deference at all, because they were vetoed and the vetoes were not overridden. They’re not laws.

I’m open to the argument that Lamberth’s decision is unjustified, although its reasoning seems plausible. But it also bears mentioning that the critique of judicial activism has less force in cases of statutory construction than in constitutional cases. If Judge Lamberth got it wrong, or Congress just doesn’t like the results, Congress can pass a new law and the president can sign it. (Assuming higher courts don’t overturn his decision.) If Judge Walker is wrong about the Constitution and higher courts back him up, there are few correctives on offer.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More