The Corner

Voting Present on the Debt Limit

I have high regard for Keith Hennessey, and make sure to read every post on his economic-policy blog. So normally I would cheer any sign that his influence is rising, as when Reihan Salam and Jennifer Rubin endorse his proposed strategy for Republicans in the debt-ceiling debate. Moreover, I agree with Hennessey’s general take on the issue: The debt ceiling ought to rise, but its increase should be paired with spending cuts.

I don’t, however, have much confidence in the strategy he has outlined for getting there. He would have Boehner and McConnell offer to pass a large increase in the debt ceiling in return for serious entitlement reform, or allow votes on a series of smaller debt-level increases for which Democrats would have to supply the majority of votes. Hennessey thinks the unwillingness of congressional Democrats to cast multiple votes to raise the debt ceiling will give Republicans leverage for spending cuts.

I see three problems here. First, a significant number of Republicans would have to vote for multiple debt-ceiling increases too. Second, Hennessey may be overestimating how uncomfortable congressional Democrats are with raising the debt limit in the age of Obama. Third, wouldn’t it look too cute to enable multiple debt-ceiling increases but not formally endorse them? If the reason Republicans would be withholding their votes is that they don’t think voters, or at least their voters, want the debt ceiling increased without spending cuts, then wouldn’t this maneuver leave them disappointed too? And wouldn’t it look to others–to people who think the debt ceiling should be increased–like an admission by Republicans that they agree but won’t do what they understand is necessary? Wouldn’t it look like Republicans are more interested in carping from the sidelines than influencing how the country is governed?

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More