The Corner

Wait . . . What?

Via Pete Wehner, I see that my friend Peter Beinart has said something very . . . odd.

[Rep. Peter King] . . . will hold hearings this week on terrorism by American Muslims. Think about that for a second. King isn’t holding hearings on domestic terrorism; he’s holding hearings on domestic terrorism by one religious group. Is most American terrorism Muslim terrorism? Actually, no. Over the last decade or so, there’s been at least as much domestic terrorism by folks like Timothy McVeigh, Theodore Kaczynski, Eric Rudolph (who bombed the 1996 Atlanta Olympics), Bruce Edwards Ivins (the main suspect in the 2001 anthrax attacks), and most recently, Jared Lee Loughner. But even if American Muslims are statistically more likely to commit terrorism than non-Muslims, it is still wrong to define the problem in religious terms. I’m pretty sure that in the 1950s, Jews — given their overrepresentation in the American Communist Party — were overrepresented as Soviet spies. Italians may have been overrepresented in organized crime. Yet for a member of Congress to define either Soviet subversion or organized crime as the province of a particular religious or ethnic group would still have been wrong.

But wait, you say, there’s a difference: It wasn’t their Jewishness that made Jews disproportionately join the Communist Party or their Italianness that made Italians disproportionately join the Mafia. Well, in a sense, it was. At a certain moment in time, certain aspects of Jewish-American or Italian-American sociology disproportionately predisposed Jews and Italians to certain problematic behavior. That may be true for Muslims today, but what the government should be targeting is the behavior, not the religious or ethnic group.

This is just weird. Peter wrote a whole book on the need to fight Islamic terrorism. Not the behavior “terrorism,” but the phenomenon recognizable as Islamic terrorism. He even argued that only liberals could fight that fight. I know he’s run away from that book. But you would think there would be enough vestigial wisdom left over that he could understand that while Islamic terrorists make up only a subset of American terrorists (a large subset), Muslims make up pretty darn close to 100 percent of all Islamic terrorists. By no means do I think that we should be stigmatizing or condemning the larger Muslim community. And I haven’t heard Peter King do that. But to listen to folks like Peter, the only way to do these hearings responsibly would be to hand over a big chunk of them to the Southern Poverty Law Center, with some digressions into environmental extremists and the mentally ill. That way all practitioners of the “behavior” of terrorism would be treated equally. This is what counts for liberal realism these days?

His argument about there being something about being Jewish or Italian that led them to be overrepresented among Communists and Mobsters is an okay debating point, I guess. But as Wehner discusses, it simply waves away a vast swath of reality, the nature of political Islam, etc.

Honest question: Has there never been a hearing on the black community’s handling of black crime? Wouldn’t that have been racist according to Peter’s reasoning? Or would it have been a logical, even humane, attempt by government to address a serious issue?

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More