The Corner

What Made People Vote for David Brat?

A polling firm called Silver Bullet has done a survey of primary voters in the Virginia’s seventh congressional district, who lifted David Brat over House majority leader Eric Cantor last week. Immigration issues — Cantor has been frequently seen as supportive of some form of comprehensive immigration reform and of legal status for some illegal immigrants — seem to have played an important role in the race, but they were not the only factor. (Caveats: The poll has a big sample size, about 800 voters, but it was automated.)

When people who said they voted for Brat were asked which issue “most influenced” their decision to vote for him, they were given four choices. The results:

Twenty-two percent may not sound like much, but it suggests a really outsized role for immigration, which polls usually find is quite far down Americans’ list of political priorities. Of course, it was one of just four options here, so that would boost its importance no matter what. In any case, 22 percent of Brat voters was enough to explain his margin of victory. (This share of people citing immigration as their main issue was also remarkably close to what a pro-comprehensive-immigration-reform group,, found in the district.)

Supporters of comprehensive reform will note that a full 48 percent of Brat voters told Silver Bullet that immigration policy was “not significant” to their vote — but 40 percent, a huge number, said it was a “significant part” of their decision to pick the professor, and 12 percent called it the ”main reason.”

Some conservative skeptics of national-security policies suggested that Brat’s criticism of the National Security Agency’s surveillance work helped boost him over Cantor, who tends to be hawkish on foreign-policy issues — the 2 percent of people who named privacy/government surveillance as their top issue seems to suggest this was not relevant.

It seems that there was something of a anti-establishment backlash against Cantor, independent of policy views: A whopping 71 percent primary voters who say they support the Tea Party went for Brat. Sixty-six percent of voters who oppose the Tea Party went for Cantor. (Twenty-six percent of the sample said they had no opinion of the Tea Party.)

Via Matt Lewis.

Patrick Brennan — Patrick Brennan is a writer and policy analyst based in Washington, D.C. He was Director of Digital Content for Marco Rubio's presidential campaign, writing op-eds, policy content, and leading the ...

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More