The Corner

Where Have You Gone, Marco Rubio? The GOP Turns Its Lonely Eyes to You

The Democrats seem to be testing Senator Marco Rubio to see how desperate he is to pass an illegal-alien amnesty. Over the past few days, the administration or congressional Democrats have openly rejected all of Rubio’s preconditions for an immigration bill, effectively daring him to walk away from the Gang of Eight.

During his amnesty sales pitch on Limbaugh’s show in January, Rubio said of the amnestied illegals in the “probationary stage” (the legal status they receive on Day One and may remain in for the rest of their lives):

they don’t qualify for any federal benefits except for one, Obamacare. Obamacare is the only federal benefit where you qualify for it, not because you have a green card but only because you’re lawfully present. That issue needs to be resolved because if Obamacare is available to 11 million people, it blows a hole in our budget and makes this bill undoable.

Fast forward to last weekend, when every Senate Democrat (plus Collins and Murkowski) voted against an amendment by Jeff Sessions to bar legalized illegal aliens from taxpayer-subsidized coverage under Obamacare. So much for that precondition.

During his Limbaugh appearance, Rubio also said this:

If, in fact, this bill does not have real triggers in there, if there is not language in this bill that guarantees that nothing else will happen unless these enforcement mechanisms are in place, I won’t support it.

But on Tuesday, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, who would implement any amnesty passed by Congress, rejected the very idea of “triggers,” benchmarks that would have to be satisfied before some provision or other of the law would go into effect. So much for that precondition.

Finally, Rubio said this to Limbaugh:

The next step in this process is to craft a starting point of legislation, and then after that it’s gonna have to go through committees and people are gonna have their input. There’s gonna be public hearings.  I don’t want to be part of a process that comes up with some bill in secret and brings it to the floor and gives people a take it or leave it.  I want this place to work the way it’s supposed to work, with every senator having input and the public having input.

Senator Sessions and all the Republican members of the Judiciary Committee except those in the Gang of Eight (Flake and Graham) sent a letter to Judiciary Committee chairman Pat Leahy asking for precisely the kind of transparency Rubio insisted would be required for his support.

Sure enough, Leahy’s petulant response rejected the GOP request. The letter said the committee would proceed to mark up the bill “with all deliberate speed,” saying that there had been enough hearings during prior Congresses. The schedule now is that the committee will begin working on the bill, without any further hearings, as soon as the Senate reconvenes April 8, in order to satisfy the president’s demand that he be sent a bill “as soon as possible.”

Senator Cruz and others have argued that such provocations are evidence the Democrats don’t want a bill at all, preferring to keep the issue unresolved so they can beat Republicans over the head with it in future elections. That’s not implausible. Rubio’s withdrawal from the Gang of Eight, or his subsequent opposition to whatever bill finally emerges from the Judiciary Committee, would doom the amnesty push. While amnesty can still be defeated if Rubio remains committed to it, it is guaranteed to fail if he pulls out, since his withdrawal would give cover to spineless Republicans (pardon the redundancy) to oppose the bill.

But I think it’s more likely that the Democrats really do want a bill but have calculated that the Republicans in general, and Rubio in particular, are so panic-stricken in their deluded desire to get immigration out of the way before the elections that they’ll simply cave on all outstanding issues. Leahy’s letter to Sessions suggested as much, praising the RNC autopsy and those Republicans who are “abandoning their former demagoguery and coming to the table.”

Rubio has met the Democrats more than halfway on this issue. In fact, he’s essentially adopted their positions on immigration, holding out only for some face-saving concessions — but even those concessions have now been decisively rejected. In the next few weeks, he will have to decide whether to lash himself to Chuck Schumer or walk away from a grotesquely deformed bill. His own future, not to mention the country’s will hinge on that decision.

Mark Krikorian — Mark Krikorian, a nationally recognized expert on immigration issues, has served as Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) since 1995.

Most Popular


Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his ... Read More

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More