The Corner

Who Is the Man Who Imagined This Isn’t Creepy?

One of my favorite moments in Mad Men (give me a pass, here, for violating the “no Mad Men after Memorial Day” rule of the blogosphere, because it’s from a few seasons ago) is when Japanophile Bert Cooper reveals his latest artistic acquisition, a paneled painting of a Geisha engaged in an intimate act with a Cephalopod, entitled “The Dream of the Fisherman’s Wife.” Cooper intimates to his creeped-out colleagues that the painting stirs thoughts about the combination of counterintuition, creativity, and monomania required to be an ad-man.

“It also, in some way, reminds me of our business,” Cooper says. “Who is that man who imagined her ecstasy?”

That’s sort of the thought I had when I saw the latest fundraising pitch from team Obama-Biden:

Who is the man who thought this was a good idea? Who is the man who thought it wasn’t both the height of presumption and shiver-inducingly gross? Really. Just because it’s “Your big day,” that’s no excuse not to support the president! After all, forsaking a “gravy bowl” (whatever that is) so that you can add infinitesimally to the billion-dollar heap of a man who has forsaken public matching funds is “a gift that we can all appreciate.”

I know this sort of pitch is probably aimed at the kind of people who have gluten-free, third-world-but-not-too-third-world destination weddings. But since I’m 28, I have a few friends getting married this summer, and they are actually, you know, counting on their wedding presents to start a future together, not to defray the cost of their tastefully-appropriated saris.

Nor is this the first time an Obama fundraising pitch has given me the heebie-jeebies in the last month week twenty-four hours. There is also this utterly bizarre letter “from” the First Lady:

For the first 10 years of our marriage, Barack and I lived in an apartment in my hometown of Chicago.

The winters there can be pretty harsh, but no matter how snowy or icy it got, Barack would head out into the cold — shovel in hand — to dig my car out before I went to work.

In all our years of marriage, he’s always looked out for me. Now, I see that same commitment every day to you and to this country.

The only way we’ll win this election is if we can rely on one another like that, all the way to November 6th.

You should know that your recent donation means a lot to both of us.

Barack is working hard, but he can’t do this alone — he needs your help.

Yes, yes, fundraising is a distasteful business in any event, but does the Obama campaign have to make it emetic as well? I mean, this disturbs on two levels — the I don’t want the government to “look out for me” the way a husband looks out for his wife level, and the even if I wanted the government to look out for me the way a husband looks out for his wife, I still want the president to select a less awkward way of expressing that sentiment level. I’d assumed that even folks who weren’t disturbed on the first level would be disturbed on the second.

But that’s not right, is it? After all, somebody wrote these things and they were signed-off on and distributed. And — here’s a truly disturbing thought — they’ll probably work. The Rightward chatter I’m hearing focuses on these pitches as reflective of the narcissism of the president. But I wouldn’t be surprised if Obama’d never laid eyes on them. Besides, I’d be less concerned if the president thought of himself this way than I am by the fact that his staffers — and financial enablers — do.

Daniel Foster — Daniel Foster has been news editor of National Review Online since 2009, and was a web site editor until 2012. His work has appeared in The American Spectator, The American ...

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More