Wrong on Taxes

Glenn Hubbard has an interesting piece in the New York Times in which he endorses the deficit commission’s recommendations to broaden the tax base through the elimination (or at least reduction) of the mortgage-interest deduction, the exemptions for charitable contributions, and the employer-provided-health-care subsidies, as well as the earned-income tax credit. He also applauds the proposition to lower the marginal tax rates on both the personal and corporate income tax. He does regret that the plan isn’t more radical in moving toward a consumption-based tax rather than an income-based one, and he regrets that it proposes to treat capital gains and dividends as ordinary income, since this move continues the tradition of favoring consumption over saving and investment.

That being said, he presents a good argument that some of the Right’s criticisms about raising taxes are not all that justified.

The right’s criticisms are more puzzling. Groups like Americans for Tax Reform insist that any member of Congress who supported the proposal would be voting for a tax increase. It is hard to share the view that no tax increase of any sort can figure in a fiscal solution. The proposal calls for taxes and spending to be capped at 21 percent of gross domestic product, which, while higher than I might design, is a serious suggestion worthy of debate.

Second, it is not reasonable to argue that there is no single activity that can face higher taxation. If the economy must pivot toward investment and exports, tax policies must be changed to encourage productive investment over consumption.

Hubbard’s point is well taken. But I think that a better lesson for the Right to learn this time around is that tax cuts won’t get us out of this crisis. Don’t get me wrong, I am all in favor of lower taxes for us all. However, in the past, Republicans have been wedded to the idea that tax cuts alone can sort out all of our financial problems and grow the economy enough to outgrow the deficit. More accurately, in the past, Republicans have spent a great deal of time arguing for lower taxes but have meanwhile neglected to cut spending and reform entitlements, which are just as important. I hope they don’t make that mistake again now that they have regained some control on the Hill, because there is no way we can grow ourselves out of this mess.

Finally, I share Hubbard’s enthusiasm about the commission’s attempt to move towards a broader based, lower rate tax system. But I definitely hope that the 21 percent cap on spending is just a high starting point, not a low one.

Veronique de Rugy — Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

Most Popular


Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More