The Corner

Yale’s Ahmadinejad Class Meeting Isn’t the Real Scandal

Yale sophomore Sharif Vakili takes on Yale lecturer Hillary Mann Leverett and her well-publicized class meeting with Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. I don’t know Vakili, but his essay is good reminder that naked realism as embraced by Leverett isn’t all it’s cracked up to be.

To me, the Ahmadinejad meeting is not the scandal, although the obsequiousness of it problematic. Based on Leverett’s syllabus, Yale’s new Jackson Institute for Global Affairs is a joke. Let’s put aside the fact that a lecturer calling herself professor is akin to a major in the army calling himself general. Let’s also put aside the fact that it’s bad form to repeatedly assign one’s own writing to the class. Finally, let’s put aside the fact that classes should not be designed for indoctrination: Leverett, for example, peddles the discredited conspiracy theory about an alleged 2003 grand bargain offer by Iran, but doesn’t note opposite interpretations, a serious omission given that Leverett’s own views are now roundly discredited.

While Leverett does assign some book excerpts (including The Israel Lobby), on many weeks, shouldn’t students paying perhaps $30,000+ per year for a Master’s Degree get assigned something more academically rigorous than the lecturer’s blog posts? It’s clear that the Jackson Center wants controversy in order to bolster its name. It pursues this, however, at the expense of academic reputation. It’s clear that Yale international-relations degrees should not be considered on the same par as those of Tufts, SAIS, Princeton, or even the Kennedy School. If the rigor of Leverett’s class is representative of the Jackson Center’s scholarship, its graduates, alas, will be unqualified for the job market.

Michael Rubin — Michael Rubin is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, senior lecturer at the Naval Postgraduate School’s Center for Civil-Military Relations, and a senior editor of the Middle East ...

Most Popular

U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More