The Corner

This Year in Campaign Financing

Allison Hayward is vice president of the Center for Competitive Politics, which today releases “After 2010: A Modern Agenda for Campaign Finance Reform.” In some Q&A-ing, Hayward explains where we are and where we can be.

LOPEZ: How huge a year was this for campaign-finance law?

HAYWARD: Well, it was certainly an important year. First, it was a contentious and competitive political year — when serious pundits are, at one point, watching about 100 congressional races, that’s a lot of territory.

And of course, the Supreme Court of handed down its Citizens United opinion, which made an impact that is hard to disaggregate from the political scene. The D.C. Circuit also handed down Speechnow, which, along with Emily’s List and a couple of other cases, shows a real interest on the part of that key circuit in protecting political activity from undo regulation. So, lots of changes in the law, to be sure.

The way lawmakers approach the regulation of political activity needs to change. But I am reluctant to say that those changes are reflected in the degree of political activity we saw — I think that was bound to happen anyway, just through different channels.

LOPEZ: How wrong is President Obama?

HAYWARD: On campaign finance? Well, I think he’s not so much wrong as aggressive. He harnessed the Citizens United opinion in a polemical State of the Union address, where he insisted that after the opinion ”foreigners” would “buy” our elections. Not true — as Justice Alito apparently also believes.

Apparently his strategy has been to encourage political activists to work with him, rather than engage in independent activity. In a way, I share that view, but we would take an entirely different approach to attaining it.

LOPEZ: How will your specific proposals help freedom?

HAYWARD: Specifically, we are calling for the contribution limits that remain in the law to be reexamined, raising them to levels that address a real threat of corruption but also allow for robust participation. We believe that one of the factors that feeds the funding of independent groups is the excessively strict “hard money” limits. We would also like to see the restrictions on party-candidate coordination removed. Again, national parties raise and spend only regulated hard money — and they should be able to work with their candidates freely.

What we don’t advocate is the conventional way of “regulating” independent political activity — we oppose any efforts to thwart groups from speaking in politics. But what we have now is a distorted system caused by old restrictions that don’t do any good. Congress really needs to rethink how it regulates here.

LOPEZ: Is removing limits on coordinated party spending a goal a president who was complaining about “secret” donors in campaigns should be able to get behind?

HAYWARD: One would think.

LOPEZ: Did he, by the way, have a point in his criticisms?

HAYWARD: I’m not sure he did, at least not the way his supporters made the argument. They were quite willing to complain that “all this money” must be coming from “secret donors” but they were never willing to devise a rule to sort out the “political” money a group might raise from the ordinary revenues it would receive through dues, fees, and other nonpolitical activity.

LOPEZ: Should the tea party care about this report?

#more#HAYWARD: Absolutely. It is the ad hoc, grassroots groups that have the most to fear from campaign-finance regulations as we presently practice them. They’re complicated, nonintuitive, and a real pain for compliance. And those who would regulate more are targeting “outside” groups for additional restrictions. I put quotes around “outside” because this is one expression that drives me nuts. What are “outside groups” outside of? Isn’t the political process the way everybody debates and decides what leadership and representation they want?

LOPEZ: Is a big part of the problem leaving Washington with Russ Feingold’s defeat?

HAYWARD: No. I think the conventional reactionary approach to campaign finance is well established, even if the advocates going forward won’t have the charm and skill of Senator Feingold.

LOPEZ: What should Congress know about this report?

HAYWARD: There are constructive things lawmakers can do to make campaign- finance regulation better. The DISCLOSE Act, in particular, reflects the old way — where campaign regulation was a blunt instrument used to bash one’s political rivals.

LOPEZ: Is there any meeting ground with the White House? Does it matter?

HAYWARD: I’d like to think so. Sure it matters!

LOPEZ: Is any elected official voicing the goals of this report? Anyone you have in mind?

HAYWARD: We will be working with a spectrum of folks, in D.C. and elsewhere. This isn’t — or shouldn’t be — a partisan or ideological issue.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More