GOP Pledge on Health Care: ‘Repeal’ Is Great, ‘Replace’ Needs Work

Let’s start with the good news: The GOP has pledged to repeal Obamacare “immediately” (see page 27 of the Pledge), which means it will be the first legislative order of business on Monday, January 3, 2011, if the GOP takes the House.

If a million North Korean soldiers pour across the DMZ or Iran launches a nuclear weapon towards Israel, I suppose that the deadline might slip, but I can’t see much else that should interfere with this priority. If it doesn’t get through the Senate, that’s fine. If the president vetoes it, that’s fine too. However, the GOP will never gain credibility on repeal unless they do this right out of the starting gate.

If the repeal does not pass immediately, then they can attack bits and pieces of it (as described by Grace-Marie Turner). The important thing is that they will have shown that they are serious about repeal.

When it comes to “replace,” however, the Republican alternative is still significantly malformed. Indeed, there’s more than a whiff of big-government Republican in it. It completely ignores the single most important reform to private health insurance: Amend the tax code to give individuals, instead of our employers, ownership of our non-taxable health dollars. The Pledge expands Health Savings Accounts, which is good, but avoids this big challenge.

The other reforms are part of an unofficial conservative canon, advocated frequently here and at other conservative organs, but are nevertheless wrong-headed, because they increase federal power over health care instead of decreasing it.

Medical-liability reform is necessary and beneficial, but it’s not Congress’s job to do it. It’s a job for state legislatures, as Lawrence J. McQuillan, Benjamin Zycher, and I have written elsewhere. (It’s Congress’s job to make sure that taxpayers in states with effective medical-malpractice laws don’t subsidize those with expensive ones, which it can do by voucherizing Medicare and Medicaid.) As I’ve discussed previously here, purchasing health insurance across state lines might be a good idea, but states can also do that on their own. That, or Congress can make clear that states can enter into a compact to facilitate this, as they have for auto insurance. Congress never passed a law attacking state sovereignty over life or homeowner’s insurance either, and the states figured these out decades ago without federal interference.

The Pledge gets worse from there, with proposed health-insurance regulations that reflect an inexcusable lack of understanding the economics of insurance. Making it illegal to “deny coverage to someone on the basis of a pre-existing condition” without mandatory coverage means people can wait until they become sick to apply for health insurance. The only way to mitigate this is through mandating continuous coverage, which the Republicans and President Clinton did in 1996. However, that did not address the fundamental problem that the government gives our employers monopolistic control over our non-taxable health dollars, as I’ve written elsewhere.

“Preventing insurers from dropping your coverage just because you get sick” was also in the 1996 law, and is also redundant, because state laws have the same provisions, as I have — you guessed it — written elsewhere.

With respect to funding state high-risk pools, I’m still struggling to understand how giving more federal money to states somehow reduces federal power over health care. However, this is what scholars including Thomas P. Miller and James C. Capretta have consistently recommended, so it’s understandable that the GOP has picked it up. Nevertheless, this funding can only makes sense as a one-time subsidy to help people who fall through the cracks when Congress changes the tax code to make health insurance personal property instead of an employer-based (so-called) benefit. After this reform, people will only buy health insurance if carriers guarantee that their premiums will not jump up after a catastrophic illness (as described by professors Mark Pauly or John H. Cochrane).

In my humble opinion, the GOP better get its head around these issues quickly, because Obamacare will come right around again if they fail to execute real reform once they get their chance. Nevertheless, House Republicans deserve congratulations on their commitment to introduce a repeal bill next January 3.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More