‘Innovation’ Center Has Unilateral Power

As the two-year anniversary of health-care law looms, conservatives have mounted a loud and effective campaign against its individual provisions, such as the individual mandate and the IPAB.

One important but oft-overlooked element of the health-care law is the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation over at CMS. One reason for the center remaining largely under the radar is that its pro-”innovation” mission has sounded fairly innocuous, though also expensive — $10 billion over ten years.

According to a new report by senator-physicians Tom Coburn and John Barrasso, however, the center is more worrisome than its name suggests. The report, which relies on a Congressional Research Service memo to Coburn, demonstrates that the legislation authorizing the center gives Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and the CMS administrator enormous power to experiment with new payment and delivery systems — which is one thing — but also to impose the results of the experiments without external checks on those results.

Coburn and Barrasso note that CRS found “no references in [the law] to any external reviews or checks on the CMS” in evaluating the results of their experiments. Not only will patients lack judicial and administrative review if they object to the center’s demonstration projects, but doctors will as well. According to Coburn and Barrasso, “health care providers are also legally prohibited from contesting the Secretary of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) use of new payment models.” The “innovation” center appears to be one more way in which the health-care law is going to interfere with the practice of medicine, and one that physicians should start paying more attention to.

Tevi Troy — Tevi Troy is the President of the American Health Policy Institute. He is also the author of the best-selling book, What Jefferson Read, Ike Watched, and Obama Tweeted: 200 Years ...

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More