Against ‘Technology!’ as Tuition Panacea

Aaron Bady, an academic and blogger from Oakland, Calif.., has written fairly extensively on the crisis in higher education. In so doing, he hit upon what I consider one of the most important, perhaps obvious, but least generally understood facts about the nature of rising costs in education:

Tuition is rising, they notice, so the cost of education must be rising. And yet isn’t it strange that in the same period of time in which tuition has risen, steadily and consistently, we have also seen the steady and consistent replacement of tenured full time faculty with part time and contingent faculty in those same universities? Which is to say, as costs of instruction have fallen dramatically, the price of an education has risen!

Shock! Could it be that universities are acting like corporations? Could it be they’re focusing on the bottom line by minimizing expenditures and charging as much as the market will hold? And could it be that, since the market demand for a college education is extremely robust, universities are able to charge quite a [lot] of money and the fact that they are, in fact, is the reason that tuition, fees, and student debt are all rising? As a passenger in the “University of California” section of the Titanic that is American higher ed, I’m pretty much convinced that this is the case.

. . . The market will bear it, so that’s how education gets priced.

While this point is certainly not revelatory for Phi Beta Cons readers, it’s perhaps the central point missed by every “student leader” working to redress skyrocketing tuition and fees from Boston to Berkeley. They just don’t get it.

Bady condenses his point in the comments section of his post, and in doing so establishes what should probably be required reading for every college trustee, faculty activist, state appropriator, and student leader:

Myglesias [Commenter]: Are you denying that if we could reduce the per student cost of producing undergraduate education that this would facilitate cheaper tuition?

[Aaron Bady]: The short answer is yes. Tuition prices are not rising because the cost of educating students is rising (because it isn’t); they are rising because the market will bear it and because administrators in both private and public universities are willing to charge it. Which means, in turn, that there’s no necessary reason to think that lowering the cost of educating students will reverse the trend.

Bingo. Taking education “open source” (another of Bady’s points) or deploying new technology and mobile learning-type innovations — whether on the college, high school, or elementary levels — will not in itself reduce the price of schooling, because that price is not well correlated with the cost of delivering the education.

The problem stems from market models being applied where they don’t belong (requiring profit justifications for maintaining the humanities), and an absence of market models where they do, in fact, belong.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More

Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian

Asked in 1972 if he believed in miracles, Billy Graham answered: Yes, Jesus performed some and there are many "miracles around us today, including television and airplanes." Graham was no theologian. Neither was he a prophet. Jesus said "a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Prophets take adversarial ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More