To Each Her Own?

I see the use of the feminine pronoun as referent all the time now, including on the part of conservative academics and writers in conservative publications. For example, “Everyone must pay her taxes.” In fact, in recent reading, I haven’t seen one instance of the masculine. There was an interim stage in which writers were using “his and her,” which could get kind of awkward, but now it’s almost exclusively the feminine. I find that it is mainly male writers doing this. What’s up? 

Are male writers trying to suggest that they are so secure in their masculinity that they can afford this deference to the female? Are they afraid of running afoul of PC? Are they trying to show their generosity to the new dispensation or just trying to sail with the times? Have they been convinced that there is some injustice or inequality in using the masculine? Or are editors and publishers demanding this? 

Whatever the answer, it is an imposition on the reader, and what it conveys is total capitulation to the feminist regime. It is also bad writing. Despite feminist protest, not only is there is nothing wrong with using the masculine pronoun as the generic referent, it is right. It is how our language works. It is similar to the way we say “mankind” or “man” to stand for both sexes. The use of the masculine pronoun is in reference to a metaphysical level of human identity, while the feminine pronoun only brings in sexuality and sexual difference and a whole range of issues where they don’t belong. It is on a par with that awful Bible translation that says, “And God created humans,” which makes biological and even anthropological what is a spiritual act. The King James Version says, “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he them, male and female created he them.” “Man,” in the abstract, metaphysical, non-biological, non-anthropological sense, includes male and female.

The use of the feminine referent signals the abandonment of this higher understanding and a willingness to be governed completely by feminist ideology. It is the feminist equivalent of the practice of totalitarian regimes where everyone is addressed as “Citizen” or “Comrade” and has no reality beyond that which is recognized by the State.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More