Help Me Follow the Logic

I know I’m coming late to this story, but since the Chronicle of Higher Ed keeps publishing material decrying the “hounding” of Frances Fox Piven following Glenn Beck’s comments about her, I’m going to comment anyway.

I must admit that I’m confused. As I understand the undisputed facts of this little controversy, Frances Fox Piven wrote an article that called for — among other things — Greek-style riots in American streets. Of course, the Greek riots caused deaths and widespread property damage. Glenn Beck took Fox Piven seriously and denounced her call for violence. Yet according to the academic establishment, Glenn Beck is the dangerous person?  

Then there’s the hilarity of the American Sociological Association. They weighed in with this gem of a statement:

Beck’s attacks have resulted in a flood of hate mail and internet postings attacking Professor Piven, including a series of death threats. While it is true that death threats are generally only a form of extremist rhetoric, they indicate an overheated emotional atmosphere that researchers on collective violence call “the hysteria zone.” It is a zone in which deranged individuals can be motivated to real violence against those targeted by demagoguery. History tells us that such things as the attempted assassination of Representative Giffords that resulted in six deaths in Tucson, Arizona can be examples of how abundant, polarizing rhetoric by political leaders and commentators can spur mass murder.

They conclude with the following:

 We call on Fox News and other responsible media to set the appropriate standards of accurate and honest debate.

Oh, the irony. The ASA calls for “accurate and honest debate” in part by spreading an ahistorical lie. “History tells us” that there is no evidence that Jared Loughner was motivated or spurred by “polarizing rhetoric” when he attacked Representative Giffords. In fact, Loughner’s hatred for Representative Giffords predates the Tea Parties.   

Lying in the name of honesty. How positively postmodern.

David French — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More