More on the “Professor of Jihad”

Following up on the John’s post from Wednesday, the facts regarding Kent State’s al Qaeda sympathizing professor are beginning to emerge. From Mike Adams’ column today and a story from the Akron Beacon Journal yesterday, it seems that (at the very least) Julio Pino contributes to and affiliates himself with the “Global War” website. For those who aren’t’ familiar with Julio’s work, the site he contributes to (but does not, apparently, own) actively supports the Taliban and al Qaeda in their war against America, Israel, and the West and also passes along “training manuals,” battle dispatches, and “jihad videos.”  Kent State — showing the courage that universities typically do when their professors’ free speech involves actual and active hatred of this country — is circling its wagons around academic freedom. Yet “academic freedom” does not include the right to use state property (computers and other information systems) to advocate jihad. And it is even arguable that some of the activities of the “Global War” site are not protected by the First Amendment at all. If the site does, in fact, attempt to provide jihadists with “training manuals” to support the declared enemies of the United States, we may very well be moving outside the realm of the free speech clause. Imagine, for example, if in 1944 we found that a college professor was passing out to sympathetic members of the community a “Third Reich sabotage guide.” There is very little question that such activity could and would be stopped — just as one could easily be arrested and prosecuted for stopping by an al Qaeda cell and distributing pamphlets designed to teach the group how to field-strip an AK-47 and manufacture homemade bombs.  At present, we don’t know the extent or nature of Julio’s “contributions” to the site, but he is — without question — playing a very dangerous game. It is one thing for a professor to openly wish for a “million Mogadishus,” applaud the destruction of the Pentagon on 9/11, or to declare 9/11 victims to be “Little Eichmanns,” but it is quite another to actively and intentionally provide materials to jihadists to help them carry out attacks against the United States. Although some in the academy may fervently wish otherwise, the First Amendment does not protect revolution.

David French — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More