New Federal Sexual-Harassment Rules Raise Alarms

Back in June, I mentioned the new federal guidelines in effect for how universities handle sexual-harassment cases. The new rules, handed down by the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights (OCR), lowered the burden of proof necessary for taking disciplinary action. Critics argue that the falsely accused may suffer unfairly under the lower standards. The Daily Caller reports the details:

The Office of Civil Rights now requires all universities which receive federal funding to use a “preponderance of evidence” standard in grievance procedures involving sexual misconduct, rather than the more strict “clear and convincing” evidence standard. . . .

Advocates of the new rules say universities have not devoted enough resources and attention to stopping sexual assaults. The AAUP countered that lower standards could damage academic freedom and due-process rights for university faculty. . . .

The change has also drawn the ire of FIRE — Freedom for Individual Rights in Education — a group that advocates for civil liberties on college campuses. FIRE vice president Robert Shibley said the lower guilt standard, the same one used in civil court cases, will lead to problems for the accused.

“It opens the door to the possibility of a lot of false convictions, and we already have examples of that,” Shibley said.

Considering the fact that faculty members can lose their jobs and professional credibility in such cases, the lower standards do seem potentially problematic. Unfortunately, the evidence in sexual-harassment cases often comes down to one person’s word against another. That makes it hard for a victim to prove his or her case. For this reason, many victims are reluctant to come forward.

On the other hand, the “his word against hers” nature of many of these cases makes it equally hard for the falsely accused to clear their names. Oftentimes, simply being accused is damaging enough to constitute a kind of punishment by itself — in terms of public disgrace — and it doesn’t matter whether the accusation is true.

No easy answers here. But, in the interest of justice, shouldn’t we err on the side of presuming innocence until clear evidence proves otherwise?

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More