Re: Tax-Credit Vouchers

With this post, I’m dropping out of the tax-credit-voucher debate. I think I’ve clearly expressed my view of the matter in too many posts; I’m just retreading ground and wasting PBC pixels. If some libertarians want to keep insisting that there’s a meaningful difference between (A) the government spending $500 on something and (B) a person “donating” $500 to that thing and then getting a $500 break on his taxes in return, there’s nothing I can do to stop them.

So, I’m going to link to Adam Schaeffer’s latest, and point out that while its hook is my most recent post on the topic, most of it is actually dedicated to an old post. That post is about whether we should voucherize charitable giving rather than giving people tax deductions for it; Schaeffer had claimed that my opposition to tax-credit vouchers entailed support for this “modest proposal,” and I agreed with some significant reservations. (I noted, for example, that it could create a sort of charity entitlement if handled on a one-person-one-voucher basis, which he spends considerable time pointing out as if it’s a fresh point.)

He also selectively quotes this post, to the point of misquoting the substance — “much (most?) deducted charity spending does not offset government spending in the slightest” becomes simply “charity spending does not offset government spending in the slightest,” and the following text responds to the inaccurate quotation, not the actual argument I made. That deserves a correction. [UPDATE: Thanks to Schaeffer for correcting the error.]

In response to Schaeffer’s question of which deductions I would eliminate, I would say: Start with the deductions that clearly don’t offset government spending. Deductions equal government funding, because they allow people to redirect some of their tax money to other purposes (they do not have the option to “keep” it, only to pay it in taxes or donate enough money to get it back via a deduction). Therefore, you should not be able to deduct expenditures that the government would not make itself.

Of course, what I originally suggested — eliminating all charitable deductions — isn’t going to happen, and (as I noted in the original post) ending the current system would eliminate the incentive (subsidy, rather) that deductions give. Thus, Schaeffer is right that this would be better if coupled with the elimination of the welfare state; otherwise, the decrease in donations could drive more people onto welfare rolls. But we have no way of knowing (A) how much giving would decline or (B) how many people are currently eligible for government programs but don’t use them only because private charity is available. And thus we have no way of knowing whether my ridiculous response to Schaeffer’s ridiculous question would in fact be catastrophic if implemented, which is a shame.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More