The New Approach: ‘Jane Goodall Greens’

Green-trade press outlet ClimateWire had a lead article this week advancing a new effort by the global-warming industry to marginalize the growing, politically dominant dissent which for years it said didn’t exist. And, if it did exist, it was only a few kooks. Denying the deniers didn’t work — there’s just too darned many of them! — so now the social scientists need to “observe” them: “These strange people. Who are they, and what makes them tick?” Ah, academia. 

So Andrew Hoffman, a University of Michigan academic, and his research assistant have moved on (for now) from comparing climate skeptics to Holocaust deniers, tobacco scientists, and anti-abolitionists — but they haven’t moved that far. After trotting out the slavery trope to wrap themselves in the warm blanket of moral superiority, they have decided to take abortion politics as their new model. (Since they’re having trouble picking an approach, may I suggest snake-oil salesmen, Mr. Ponzi, or carnies, since none of these schemes would detectably affect the climate? That’s a pretty good clue the schemes aren’t about the climate. More on that momentarily.)

They express particular concern that I said, “The environmental agenda seeks to use the state to create scarcity as a means to exert their will, and the state’s authority, over your lives,” in a talk at the Heartland Institute’s most recent international climate conference. I also said it at the Conservative Political Action Conference and say it regularly on campus.

The context for this remark is not a mystery. It constitutes a key element of the premise for my most recent book, Power Grab, in which I exhaustively detail how this is so. George Will also wrote a wonderful column last November in which he noted similar thoughts about abundant energy, which is the true bête noire of the environmentalist movement, and which “horrifies people who relish scarcity because it requires — or so they say — government to ration what is scarce and to generally boss people to mend their behavior. . . . Today, there is a name for the political doctrine that rejoices in scarcity of everything except government. The name is environmentalism.”

But the social scientists are intrigued and curious to know why I would say such a thing about the green agenda. Thank you for asking! It’s because the alarmists say the same. I simply dare you to believe them. Here is a sampler.

Longtime spokesperson for the global-warming science community (now semi-heretic) Judith Curry, head of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Tech, in a remarkable post-ClimateGate pivot:

“No one really believes that the ‘science is settled’ or that ‘the debate is over.’”

“Scientists and others that say this seem to want to advance a particular agenda.”

“There is nothing more detrimental to public trust than such statements.”

Huh. ClimateGate’s Phil Jones also told the BBC that anyone who says this has his own reason, and he won’t judge what his motives are.

Has anyone else volunteered insights on the agenda, someone not accusing others but expressing his own knowledge?

Spokesman for the Blue-Green Alliance David Foster says: “It is an economic-restructuring bill for the global economy. We should not pretend that it isn’t.”

Erstwhile Democratic party ‘green’ star, and Obama ‘green czar’ Van Jones, has been extremely helpful in this regard:

“The slogan of ‘green jobs’ is the banner under which all of the pro-democracy forces can gather for the next big assaults.”

“We want to move from suicidal gray capitalism . . .  So the green economy will start off as a small subset, and we’re going to push it, and push it, and push it, until it becomes the engine for transforming the whole society.”

(Ah, the ol’ ‘fundamentally transform America’ again.)

And where to begin with Tom Totalitarianism’s Cool Friedman?

Other than these facts above, there’s no reason for me to claim that the green movement is about creating energy scarcity to make government more powerful and intrusive. Oh, wait. There are many, many more reasons. Power Grab details the more recent acknowledgements, as there are years and years’ worth — and a steady stream, previously detailed in The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming and Environmentalism and Red Hot Lies.

My apparently curious statement is quoting the environmental movement’s front-men (and women), asking whether or not we should take them at their word. It seems our academic friends are either genuinely unaware of this wealth of argument, or they hope to wave it all away. If the latter, then it seems the new tactic is to get you to believe the greens have really just been lying. We’ll see how well that works.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More