Piñeda Tar

Michael Piñeda knew that he would be watched closely during last night’s start in Boston, considering that he had been questioned for allegedly using pine tar in his last outing against the Red Sox.

Nonetheless, after a rough first inning in which he allowed two runs, the pitcher walked out to the mound to pitch the second with a large smear of pine tar on the side of his neck.

Sox Skipper John Farrell seemed almost apologetic for having to say something to the home-plate umpire:

“You could see it. I could see it from the dugout. It was confirmed by a number of camera angles in the ballpark. And given the last time we faced him, I felt like it was a necessity to say something,” Farrell said after the Red Sox’s 5-1 win at Fenway Park. “I fully respect on a cold night you’re trying to get a little bit of a grip, but when it’s that obvious, something has got to be said.”

For violating Rule 8.02(a), Piñeda was ejected from the game and faces a ten-game suspension.

Meanwhile, David Schoenfield of ESPN SweetSpot raises questions about this type of cheating:

The trouble, of course, is even if all the players generally accept substances like pine tar and sunscreen as part of the unwritten rules of baseball: How should you legislate their usage? Right now, those are foreign substances and, by rule, are illegal. The Red Sox were certainly within their right to request a check on Pineda.

Are there levels of cheating? Steroids are evil bad stuff but pine tar is OK? But what about Whitey Ford’s mud or Don Sutton’s sandpaper? What if some pitchers can throw a better slider by applying a little extra pine tar on the right spot on the ball?

It’s certainly a slippery slope and as baseball wrestles with some of the issues involving instant replay or the new transfer rule, it has another can of worms (or cans of spray-on sunscreen) to deal with. If you’re all about enforcing the rules — whether it’s catching steroids users or defining a catch — do you start enforcing the use of foreign substances by pitchers?

More here and here.

Most Popular

U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Religion

Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian

Asked in 1972 if he believed in miracles, Billy Graham answered: Yes, Jesus performed some and there are many "miracles around us today, including television and airplanes." Graham was no theologian. Neither was he a prophet. Jesus said "a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Prophets take adversarial ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More