American Favelas

Eli Dourado makes an admirably forthright case for allowing larger numbers of impoverished foreign workers to settle in the U.S., as doing so would greatly reduce the cost of hiring live-in domestic servants while also alleviating global poverty. I disagree with Eli rather strongly, but he is always worth reading. 

To briefly elaborate on why I disagree with Eli, my sense is that while some inequalities might be tolerable in a democratic nation-state (I’m inclined to think that fairly extreme upper-tail inequality is more or less politically sustainable, and that its benefits might outweigh its costs), others are much less so. The persistence and intergenerational transmission of poverty in the U.S. is, in my view, a real challenge to the legitimacy of U.S. institutions, and allowing for a substantial increase in the number of individuals earning poverty-level wages via more open immigration policy would exacerbate this problem, and introduce a number of other complications. We could devote more public sector resources to investing in the human capital of the children of less-skilled immigrants in order to make it somewhat likely that they will become full participants in American economic and civic life, but this would entail trade-offs that might prove detrimental to the interests of other members of the community in question. If one believes that citizens of a given democratic nation-state should not value the lives of fellow citizens over those of foreigners, such objections are immaterial, and I take this to be Eli’s view (and, implicitly or explicitly, the view of many other advocates of a substantial increase in the less-skilled influx). I reject this view, for reasons I’ve explored elsewhere.

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More