Brief Thoughts on the Politics of the Safety Net and Work Incentives

In an article on the origins of Paul Ryan’s ideological convictions, Joel Achenbach of the Washington Post quotes Theda Skocpol, a sociologist perhaps best known for her work on the history of social insurance in the United States:

Ryan’s critics say his vision of government sapping American vigor is a fantasy.

“I think it’s poppycock,” said Theda Skocpol, professor of government and sociology at Harvard University. “His ideas are very, very old, and a very abstract ideology. They’re interesting as an extreme statement of a very harsh worldview.”

She added: “I just don’t think there’s evidence that Americans don’t want to work. Americans are working harder for less pay in real terms.”

I found Skocpol’s statement interesting, as it seemed overly broad. Having followed Ryan closely, and having been critical of some of his policy initiatives, I don’t think he believes “that Americans don’t want to work.” Rather, I think he believes that in some cases, efforts to provide social assistance can undermine work incentives.

In recent years, the economists David Autor and Mark Duggan have been conducting fascinating research on disability insurance. We’ve discussed Autor and Duggan’s contributions on a number of occasions in this space. One of the basic insights of their work is that as labor market opportunities for less-skilled men have deteriorated, the relative attractiveness of going on Social Security disability insurance has increased. SSDI does not promise a good living by any means. The benefits are meager. Yet SSDI also provides medical insurance, the value of which has increased considerably in relative terms. And while the benefits are meager, they are more reliable than private wages for people working at the low-end of the labor market, who tend to bear the brunt of unemployment at the bottom of a business cycle. 

Note that there are no bad guys in this story. The workers who have seen their labor market prospects deteriorate are not trying to game the system Rather, they are trying to make their way in the world as best they can, for themselves and for the people who matter to them. SSDI and our broader labor market institutions are not structured very well to meet the challenges these workers face, which is one of the reasons why Autor and Duggan have proposed sweeping reforms. Another reason, however, is that Autor and Duggan see the current expansion of the disability rolls as unsustainable, as it will necessitate a sharp increase in spending that might divert resources from much-needed public investments.

It is fair to say that Ryan hasn’t addressed SSDI in any great detail, partly because, as Autor and Duggan note, the politics of the issue are problematic. Duggan, moreover, served on President Obama’s Council on Economic Advisors, and one gets the strong impression that his sympathies are with the center-left.

But the broader project of reforming the safety net is not really about a left-right clash. Regardless of one’s underlying ideological presuppositions, one can embrace the idea that social protections can inadvertently create work disincentives, and that this is a danger that we should be mindful of. 

The problematic aspect of Ryan’s agenda, in my view, is his take on Medicaid reform and (potentially) work supports. Yet this is why Ryan has initiated a constructive conversation: we can decide to spend somewhat more on programs like Medicaid and work supports than Ryan has outlined, but to do so we will need to raise taxes above postwar norms, and not just for high-earners. That is a case the Obama administration has not been willing to make to the detriment of having a rational, open conversation about our fiscal future.

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More