Contracting Out Services In a Wasteful Manner Will Waste Money

If you want to save money by contracting out services, you need to have smart, competent people designing the proposal. The proposal should have clear metrics and performance targets, and you should have people on staff who are capable of rigorously and fairly evaluating whether or not targets are being met. 

If you’re surprised to discover that the federal government does a terrible job of contracting out services, I fear you haven’t been paying close attention. 

Rather bizarrely, Ron Nixon of the New York Times is juxtaposing the fact that the federal government isn’t very good at outsourcing, something that virtually all successful U.S. firms have found they must do well to survive and flourish, with the question of compensation differentials between the public and private sectors:


The study found that in 33 of 35 occupations, the government actually paid billions of dollars more to hire contractors than it would have cost government employees to perform comparable services. On average, the study found that contractors charged the federal government more than twice the amount it pays federal workers.

The study was conducted by the Project on Government Oversight, a nonprofit Washington group. The federal government spends about $320 billion a year on contracts for services. The POGO study looked at a subset of those contracts.

The study comes after months of criticism, mostly by Republicans, about what they see as the high cost of salaries and benefits for federal workers.  The House earlier this year passed a Republican budget plan that would freeze pay grade levels and eliminate raises for five years, and cut the government’s work force by 10 percent. Last year, President Obama announced a two-year salary freeze for federal workers, which Republicans said did not go far enough.

The Heritage Foundation, a conservative research group in Washington, released a report last year that found that federal employees earn 22 percent more in hourly wages than the private sector. The Heritage study also found that if federal employee compensation were adjusted to match that of their private sector counterparts, federal spending would be reduced by $47 billion in 2011 alone.

But POGO said its study did not just compare the salaries of the two sectors; instead it focused on what the government actually pays contractors to perform services versus how much it would cost to have that work done by in-house staff members.

I have a news flash: it is possible for a firm that is really good at what it does to pay its employees really well and to still do a better job than a firm that does what it does much less well. My impression is that private contractors are hoping to extract as much as they can from the federal government. They are, after all, for-profit firms. Private contractors are also hoping to extract as much as they can from other private firms. The responsibility of the federal government is the same as that of a responsible business owner or manager: to be a shrewd customer. 

So why isn’t the federal government a shrewd customer? One possibility is that the compensation structure is poorly designed. It’s not about overall overcompensation or undercompensation so much as it is about the fact that some (if not most) employees are overcompensated while procurement officers, perhaps the most important employees of all, are not a much higher priority — that is, the federal government should be headhunting the best procurement officers from around the world, offering bounties, citizenship, and a large plot of land in scenic Maine or Montana or both to skilled procurement officers from Singapore or Switzerland or private industry and paying them a competitive salary. 

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More