Did Obamacare’s Champions Simply Misunderstand the Nature of the Uninsured Problem?

Megan McArdle raises the possibility that the uninsured problem in the United States might not be quite as bad as many of us had assumed as (1) the number of people who are uninsured at any particular moment is considerably higher than the number of people who are continuously uninsured over a longer period of time; (2) we often rely on self-reported data to determine the size of the uninsured population and the incomes of the uninsured, and self-reported data isn’t always reliable; and (3) the fact that the transitional high-risk pools established under Obamacare attracted only 100,000 people rather than the 400,000 people HHS had anticipated is suggestive — if the pre-existing condition problem was smaller than expected (and we don’t know if that’s true, but that’s one possible reason for the underenrollment), something similar could be at work with the broader problem. Elsewhere, Megan addresses “doc shock” — how consumers are reacting to narrow networks on the exchanges. I’m a fan of narrow networks. Yet I’m also a fan of an approach to health-system reform that is less of a “big bang” than the Obamacare approach, and more of a gradual transition to a more coherent set of subsidies. The emerging political backlash against narrow networks is discouraging, but hardly surprising. 

Thomas Miller of the American Enterprise Institute has a short article on the kind of health system conservatives ought to build in a post-Obamacare world, which is well-tailored to a scenario in which the challenges facing the uninsured, and the underinsured, is not quite what Obamacare’s champions imagined it was:

So what should we do instead? First, allow willing parties to find each other in more transparent and accountable marketplaces. Dial back the ACA’s dense set of counterproductive benefits mandates and insurance price controls. Second, replace the unpopular and ineffective individual mandate to purchase Washington-approved insurance with new incentives to maintain continuous coverage instead. Individuals who stay insured would be assured of guaranteed renewability without new health-risk rating, plus protection against exclusions for pre-existing health conditions. Similar guarantees already existed for the employer group market under federal law almost fourteen years before the ACA was ever enacted. They should be extended to the individual insurance market.

What about the much smaller number of Americans who might nevertheless be at risk of being left behind? Greater reliance on state-administered high-risk pools that are more effectively financed (with significant federal taxpayer support) and better structured to set a reasonable cap on non-standard rates can ensure that no one will be “uninsurable” by facing premiums for coverage that are either unaffordable or unavailable due to their health status.

Over the next few months, we are going to see a new round of new legislative proposals aimed at replacing Obamacare, which will face tremendous scrutiny. 

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More