Disaggregating Global Imbalances

Earlier this month, Andrew Batson of the Wall Street Journal wrote a blockbuster article on how we calculate trade deficits, and he draws on an October speech by the director-general of the WTO Pascal Lamy:

 

“What we call ‘Made in China’ is indeed assembled in China, but what makes up the commercial value of the product comes from the numerous countries,” Pascal Lamy, the director-general of the World Trade Organization, said in a speech in October. “The concept of country of origin for manufactured goods has gradually become obsolete.”

Mr. Lamy said if trade statistics were adjusted to reflect the actual value contributed to a product by different countries, the size of the U.S. trade deficit with China—$226.88 billion, according to U.S. figures—would be cut in half.

Add this to the case against GDP fetishism. GDP is a useful but crude tool. It is best used for gross comparisons and long-term comparisons, and as a way to think about the amount of value that a government can extract from the economy in taxes. Consumer surplus and psychic income can’t be extracted by states to yield tax revenues and the efficacy of government isn’t captured in GDP. And now it seems that, at the edges at least, we might be miscalculating GDP by miscalculating the real size of our trade imbalances.

On this particular question, I’m fascinated by how much of the wealth created in today’s advanced market economies revolves around copyright and patent protections that, in my view, are at best necessary evils. Crudely, you could say that while the manufacturing hubs assemble the physical stuff, the core brain economies provide the IP software layer and the, um, pizzaz? Swagger? Cache or positionality? Brand authenticity seems to be about managing and husbanding invented scarcities. Much of our relative affluence depends on this process. Governments raise tax revenues off of firms that do little more than manufacture a shortage of public esteem. 

 Geoffrey Miller offers insight into this strange process in his wonderful, quirky book Spent: Sex, Evolution, and Consumer Behavior.

Miller’s thesis is part of why I admire those who are not “neurotypical.” To see through hierarchies and status distinctions, e.g., to become a threshold earner at a relatively low level of work effort, is in some sense to have successfully cracked the code of modern urban life. 

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More