Further Note on Dissenting by Deciding

Reuel Marc Gerecht, one of my favorite policy thinkers, often argues that elections are a crucial first step in fostering more open societies because they force political movements to take responsibility for the more mundane demands of government. As an example, a radical Islamist political movement that has historically blamed “the far enemy” for a society’s poverty while in opposition might find that its support will evaporate if it continues to do as the party in power. In “Dissenting by Deciding,” Heather Gerken argues along similar lines:

At first glance, dissenting by deciding may seem more radical than conventional dissent because electoral minorities are able to use the apparatus of governance to express disagreement. If we look more closely, decisional dissent may make dissent less radical because it is incremental—it takes place within a space chosen by the majority—and it directs the energies of dissenters toward governance as well as resistance. Decisional dissent may empower dissenters, but it seems as likely to tame dissent by undermining its rebellious or iconoclastic possibilities. In the long run, the notion of dissenting by deciding seems likely to help us think of dissent as an everyday act of citizenship rather than an act of disaffiliation.    

This, in my view, is the central reason why fiscal stimulus measures that transfer resources from the federal to state and local governments are so important for the political left. Because state and local governments have limited options in a fiscally constrained environment, state and local officials are forced to make difficult choices across different categories of public spending. This spending discipline is likely to generate intense conflict, particularly in environments in which the authorities in question are bound by labor agreements that make it difficult to embrace productivity-enhancing reforms, as the main alternative to spending discipline is embracing tax increases. The viability of this latter strategy depends to some degree on the presence of fixed amenities in the region in question, i.e., a government in a region with an attractive climate or a region in which there is a large, historically entrenched talent agglomeration can extract more than a government in a less obviously appealing place, where the exit of highly productive people is a more potent threat to the public fisc. 

The beauty of large-scale fiscal transfers from the federal government to state and local governments, from the perspective of those who want to expand the size and scope of the state, is that these measures shield state and local taxpayers from visible tax increases through the use of debt finance. This isn’t to suggest that these fiscal transfers are necessarily inappropriate. What it does mean, however, is that those who believe that spending discipline can encourage constructive, productivity-enhancing reforms should be wary of calls to entrench these transfers rather than make them a strategy that is only pursued under exigent circumstances. This approach forces dissenters to make hard choices that might yield very positive results — or that might discredit various “rebellious or iconoclastic possibilities.”

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More