Further Note on Ryan’s Reply

I have no idea if Rep. Paul Ryan’s reply to President Obama’s AP speech will get any attention, but this section merits it:

CLAIM: “Seniors bear the risk. If the voucher isn’t enough to buy a private plan with the specific doctors and care that you need, that’s too bad.”

REALITY: Incorrect: If Medicare spending grows faster than GDP + 0.5 percent – the same growth rate that the President has proposed for his board of 15 unaccountable bureaucrats (IPAB) to impose upon Medicare – then Congress would be required to intervene and could implement policies that change provider reimbursements, program overhead, and means-tested premiums. Under our plan, the entire risk would not fall on the beneficiary – Congress would be required to act. Under the President’s plan, the entire risk of IPAB’s cuts – which Medicare’s own chief actuary has said could “jeopardize access to care for beneficiaries” – would fall on the senior unless a supermajority of Congress voted to intervene. [Emphasis added]

It’s amazing. The president is literally replying to an entirely different Medicare reform proposal — perhaps to some version of Ryan’s FY2012 Medicare reform proposal — than the one the House Budget Committee advanced this year. 

One has to wonder: who was responsible for writing and fact-checking this speech? Ultimately, I suspect these errors will be immaterial, unless, that is, prominent national media outlets actually report on them. 

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More