Information Absorption Inequality

Izabella Kaminska shares informal thoughts on information overload:

Truth is information is power. You can choose to ignore it and get behind, but this is a market like anything else. And you can’t stop or shut it down just because you can’t keep up. Only the strongest and best at absorbing and processing all this information will survive.

This is why bloggers and journalists like us (those using social media rather than those using old techniques) become so insightful. We do the reading so you don’t have to.

But guess what, the amount of material we consume on a daily basis relative to the investment community which still operates on 1990s information terms (a research note here, a pontification there, a look at the newspaper — yesterday’s news, tomorrow ) makes me realise the scale of the power chasm that is forming between the informed, those who know and do exploit the information available, and the uninformed, who don’t because it gets in the way of their quality of life.

The new inequality will be an information absorption inequality.

You can’t switch the information off. You can’t opt out without the trade off being that you will be dumber and less informed and thus probably more rubbish at making investment choices. [Emphasis added]

Brink Lindsey has written an excellent book — Human Capitalism, the extended version of which comes out in May — which carefully argues that “information absorption inequality,” understood more broadly, has been the central driver of the larger transformation of the advanced market economies, and in particular the dispersion of income and wealth across households.

Why are the blessings of American life so unevenly distributed? Because of complexity, I will argue. It is my contention that, although things were very different in the relatively recent past, today the primary determinant of socioeconomic status is the ability to handle the mental demands of a complex social environment. If you can do that, you’ll likely have ample opportunities to find and pursue a career with interesting, challenging, and rewarding work. But if you can’t, you’ll probably be relegated to a marginal role in the great social enterprise— where, among other downsides, you’ll face a dramatically higher risk of falling into dysfunctional and self-destructive patterns of behavior. Complexity has opened a great divide between those who have mastered its requirements and those who haven’t.

Though Lindsey focuses, as he must, on conventional measures of human capital, e.g., college-educated vs. non-college-educated, the truth, as he makes clear, is more granular. And a focus on the aforementioned dispersion of income and wealth masks intangible, harder-to-measure factors, like subjective well-being or, more specifically, feelings of security, stimulation, and satisfaction. The ability to navigate a complex social environment is unevenly distributed, e.g., the ability to use recreational drugs without becoming dependent is unevenly distributed, as some individuals are embedded in supportive environments that encourage responsible consumption and don’t have psychological or (perhaps) physiological proclivities towards addiction while others lead very isolated lives and do bend towards self-destructive behavior, etc. So behavior that can be quite pleasant and rewarding and mind-expanding for some can become a paralyzing nightmare for others. Lindsey’s framework is very useful for understanding the world in which we live. 

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More