Jonathan Chait on the Evolution of the GOP

In a new TNR review essay, Jonathan Chait of New York draws on Geoffrey Kabaservice’s Rule and Ruin to make the case that the GOP has grown incorrigibly radical. Towards the end of the piece, Chait offers a meditation on where he thinks moderate conservatives like David Brooks and Ross Douthat, my co-author, have gone wrong. Though I disagree with Chait’s thesis, his essay is well worth reading as a distillation of how one smart center-left thinker interprets today’s Republican party.

I was particularly inclined to read Chait’s essay because he recently wrote a smart, fair-minded essay on the pervasive liberalism of the entertainment industry (it’s real) and its impact on the wider culture (it’s significant). 

It turns out that I reviewed Kabaservice’s book for Foreign Affairs a few months back, and my interpretation of the GOP’s evolution is, not surprisingly, markedly different from Chait’s. The conservative conversation in recent years has gone from maddeningly vague small government sentiment to a more rigorous, if still imperfect, critique of the workings of the welfare state, e.g.:

(a) there is a new conservative consensus around how to restructure existing health entitlements, though there remains considerable disagreement over how to pursue coverage expansion;

(b) led by Sen. Pat Toomey, who had earlier on served as the president of the anti-tax Club for Growth, a large number of congressional Republicans embraced the idea that an eventual deficit-reduction deal could include revenue increases relative to the current policy — not the current law — baseline;

and (c) at the state and local level, conservatives are actively rethinking the delivery of public services like K-12 and medical care for the poor and aged. Calls for revising the terms of public employment are part of a broader effort to emphasize the importance of business model innovation in the public sector.

Like Yuval Levin, I believe that conservatives are seeking big structural changes to the welfare state because they actually want to preserve the basic postwar bargain: the state will provide for older Americans and the very poor without crowding out private initiative. The trouble is that preserving this basic postwar bargain will mean containing cost growth, and this in turn will require embracing ambitious market-oriented reforms.

The obvious rejoinder to my analysis is that it is ingenuous and overly optimistic, and my analysis certainly doesn’t translate into how conservatives on the national stage tend to talk about complex public policy issues. I’m sympathetic to Evan Soltas’s interpretation of this phenomenon: Republicans have a counterproductive tendency to characterize modest policy initiatives in sweeping language. Medicare competitive bidding, for example, could have been characterized as an effort to fix Medicare Advantage, a popular and familiar program.

My optimism is rooted in my interpretation of developments on the ground — how Louisiana’s school reforms have enabled new charter management organizations and specialized instructional providers to flourish, how Florida’s Medicaid reforms have achieved significant cost savings, how Indiana achieved significant efficiency gains across state government, etc. I’m very aware of the fact that I could be wrong. But parties are built to win, and what we might call the Daniels-Christie-Jeb Bush thesis is just a better fit for the changing electorate. 

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Culture

Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his ... Read More
Immigration

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More
U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More