Max Baucus’s Corporate Tax Reform Could Stymie the Manufacturing Revival

Ramesh Ponnuru argues against Montana Sen. Max Baucus’s corporate tax reform proposal:

To pay for the reduction in the tax rate, the Baucus plan slows the rate at which companies can write off the cost of investment. This trade-off may have been made merely to get the numbers to work, but its effect is to favor past investments over future ones.

And as Jim Pethokoukis observes, this implies that the corporate tax code will be even friendlier to incumbents relative to new entrants under Baucus’s reform than it is today, drawing on an analysis by Alan Viard:

First, we shower windfalls on investments that have already been made by giving companies tax savings that they were never promised. This reward for past investment is senseless – we can’t change the past. Then, we turn around and raise the tax penalty on new investments, which can still be changed. And they will be changed – the stiffer penalty will discourage investment and slow economic growth.

To understand why this matters, consider Mark Mills on the prospects for a domestic manufacturing revival:

In a remarkably little-noticed report this past summer the American Chemical Council (ACS) catalogued nearly 100 chemical industry investments valued at over $70 billion that are coming on-line by 2017.  This will generate over one million jobs and add over $300 billion to the GDP.

The effects of the boom in the energy-intensive manufacturing ecosystem will inevitably ripple out, catalyzing more manufacturing both upstream and downstream.  New less energy-intensive manufacturing businesses will take advantage of the proximity to low-cost high-reliability supplies and suppliers  as well as the growth in labor force skills and the advances and investments in new underlying technologies.   That’s how industrial and economic ecosystems work.  And that’s precisely what policymakers hope will happen when they try to “stimulate” such outcomes.  But none of this requires taxpayer money.  In this case, all activity is adding to state and federal treasuries.

This manufacturing resurgence comes at a critical time.  Manufacturing is not part of yesterday’s economy despite the prevalence of the post-industrial trope.  Manufacturing underlies everything we use daily to survive, prosper or enjoy.  Everything.

The App revolution (about which more here) that is unleashing productivity in everything from retail to healthcare services is anchored in hardware.  Computers and smartphones are made possible by manufacturing processes: the conversion of sand into silicon, bauxite into aluminum, manganese and a mélange of magnetic elements into memory, oil into plastics, and coal into electricity.  How Amazon operates and what it delivers are all firmly anchored in manufacturing.  Ditto WalMart and FedEx.  Quite literally everything around us that makes possible all we do every day is manufactured from the material world.  The vaunted rise of the “service economy” is inseparable from manufacturing, except in the minds of post-industrialists,

The embedded feedback loop that is part of the innovation ecosystem linking “services” and “manufacturing” has been lucidly argued by Intel’s legendary Andy Grove.  For example, software (supposedly in “services”) for semiconductor manufacturing, is an inextricably integral part of every stage from design to production and operation. 

This seems like the wrong moment to raise taxes on new capital to finance lower taxes for old capital.


Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More