The Mutant Supremacy Agenda

Matt Yglesias, writing on X-Men: First Class, a film I saw twice this past weekend, suggests that Magneto’s radical mutant supremacy agenda has its virtues:


The film is a pretty serious departure from the conventional depiction in this regard, but it’s quite thoroughgoing. Magneto’s mutant pride attitude is in every way more admirable than Xavier’s preference for the closet, and Xavier’s political view that mutants and humans can coexist peacefully if mutants avoid provocations is directly contradicted by the events at the end of the film. When Xavier is trying to convince Magneto (and the audience) that Magneto’s more militant methods will cost innocent life he literally says—to a Holocaust survivor!—that “they were only following orders” and therefore their sins are forgivable.

The mutant pride message is a radical one. It’s too radical for those whose WASP male privilege in their non-mutant lives makes them instinctively want to identify with existing power structures. But a mutant who’s also a Jew, or a woman, or a racial minority, or has had blue or red skin all of his or her life doesn’t suffer from that kind of false consciousness and gets ahead of the curve.

In fairness, Matt is really saying that the film presents Magneto’s mutant pride attitude as more admirable than Xaxier’s integrationist vision, which is fair enough. I wrote a short essay for TNR Online in 2003 how the X-Men comics had moved in a more militant direction:


To explain, the conceit of the X-Men comic book universe is that evolution has, post-penicillin, continued to work its magic on humankind, and that the next stage in human evolution— the mutants (some super-powered, some who look like chickens, but all different from run-of-the-mill men and women)–lives among us, and uneasily at that.

Some humans and mutants seek to peacefully coexist, to build a realizable utopia in which mutual respect is the order of the day. Beyond peaceful coexistence, many of these humans and mutants also believe that the notion that humans and mutants are essentially different is misconceived— underneath the skin, be it blue or scaly, we’re all the same. This stance, championed in the old days (the comic book series originated in the early 1960s) by Professor Charles Xavier and the X-Men, his doughty band of proteges, clearly parallels the liberal integrationist stance of Martin Luther King Jr. and Bayard Rustin, among others. By contrast, Xavier’s adversaries, led by the brilliant and charismatic Magneto, master of magnetism, call for utter mutant supremacy or, failing that, mutant separation and sovereignty, a worldview best described as Black Power on steroids.

For most of the series’ history, there was no moral ambiguity: Magneto’s mutant militancy was depicted as a deranged, perverse, self-defeating response to the very real oppression suffered by mutants. Xavier’s “dream” of harmonious human-mutant relations was, by comparison, as necessary an animating ideal as it was frustratingly difficult to achieve in a world rife with hatred and mistrust.

But as time wore on, this straightforward narrative of good and evil grew less compelling. During the late 1980s and early 1990s, just as the tide of multicultural politics was cresting in the real world, and as many left-leaning Americans came to see integrationism as little more than grist for bourgeois self-congratulation, the writers of the X-Men series began slowly rehabilitating Magneto’s old vision. At first, it was a matter of nuance— yes, he was an awful man, but he had complex and not entirely ignoble motivations. He was, the writers eventually informed us, a Holocaust survivor, and so his hatred of humanity derived from a desire to protect his people from extermination. Like Malcolm X’s Nation of Islam, Magneto’s Brotherhood of Evil Mutants was “the hate that hate produced.”

And who couldn’t identify with this brand of hate, with its promise of baptismal revolutionary violence and the absolution that comes with it? With time, the rehabilitation of Magneto became something more than nuance and context— the X-Men’s arch-nemesis became a romantic figure, figuratively and literally. (While traipsing about the pre-historic Savage Land, Magneto took X-Woman Rogue as his lover in the early 1990s.) At worst, his was a lost cause. Perhaps Magneto was tilting at windmills, but the comic book gave readers the distinct impression that his was the right cause, particularly when he turned from explicitly calling for the enslavement and annihilation of all humans to just wanting a place in the sun.

Eventually the United Nations, in its infinite wisdom, installed Magneto as ruler of Genosha, an island state that had previously used genetic engineering to turn mutants into servile zombies, on the condition that he promise not to wage war against humanity ever again. As with most real U.N. projects, this comic-book version ended disastrously. With clockwork precision, Magneto first made the humans of Genosha second-class citizens and, once he felt up to it, declared war against humanity.

The plan backfired— humanity won the war, and then, just when things calmed down, Xavier’s long-lost mutant twin dispatched a convoy of massive robots to wipe out the island’s entire population, including Magneto (for the umpteenth time). But the real loser was Xavier’s integrationist dream. Rather than reaffirm the X-Men’s belief in coexistence, the destruction of Genosha has caused a crisis of confidence in X-Men-land. Even Professor X has adopted a more confrontational stance, which is not unlike Gandhi donning bandoliers and gleefully firing rounds from a Kalashnikov. Under his auspices, mutants have formed menacing Kahane Chai-style paramilitary groups. If the dream isn’t dead, it’s on its last legs.

I ended the piece with an ominous warning:

In part, this shift from cautious reformism to ennui to Magneto-esque millenarianism reflects a desire by Marvel Comics to make their flagship title more daring and risque. That’s to be expected. And yet it also reflects a shift in the broader culture. Integrationism just isn’t in. As we flee to our own “Mutant Towns,” our miniature Bohemias, our “Valhallas” and “Nerdistans,” it might be worthwhile to stop and reflect on the damage that’s already been done. Even our superheroes aren’t immune to the forces that pull us apart. Can’t we all just get along?

I’ll just add that I think that while Charles Xavier comes across as a naive product of privilege, it is important to remember that Magneto’s mutant supremacy agenda is premised on a desire to hasten the extinction of homo sapiens sapiens. Moreover, Stryker’s stance, that the rise of mutantkind represents a grave danger to humanity, is not entirely unreasonable.  

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular


Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his ... Read More

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More