My Latest Column: Base-Broadening as an Instrument of Conservative Tax Reform

In my experience, it is never a good sign when Ramesh Ponnuru disagrees with you. But earlier today, Ramesh made the case that base-broadening tax reform is a political non-starter: eliminating the exclusion of employer-provided health insurance from income and payroll taxes would be extremely disruptive, though reforming it is desirable; the tax preference for capital income is, as Alan Viard has argued, “imperfect, but useful“; the mortgage interest deduction is politically sacrosanct; the tax credit for children is best understood as “as a partial corrective to other federal policies,” e.g., the fact that parental investment in the human capital investment of the next generation is treated less favorably than other forms of investment; the charitable tax deduction is a very good thing; and while there is no strong case for the state and local tax deduction, politicians representing high-tax jurisdictions will fight it vigorously.

My latest column, in contrast, argues that there are a number of base-broadening measures — eliminating the state and local tax deduction, shrinking the mortgage interest deduction, curbing the tax-exempt status of municipal-bond interest, and overhauling the charitable tax deduction to make it more valuable for non-filers and somewhat less valuable for high-earners — that would advance conservative policy goals and that might prove politically advantageous. Substantively, I don’t disagree with much of Ramesh’s analysis, but I think that tweaks to some of the most popular tax expenditures could yield significant long-term benefits, including political benefits.

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More