The Perfect Outcome?

At the risk of sounding Pollyannaish, I wonder if last night’s result might represent the perfect outcome for conservative reformers who want to revive the Republican Party.

Doug Hoffman’s defeat comes as a serious blow to the activists who fought against Scozzafava, a candidate well to the left of Arlen Specter. I was particularly impressed by the words of Scozzafava’s husband, Ron McDougall.

“This has been a difficult day for my family. But the needs and concerns of the men and women of the 23rd Congressional District remain paramount,” McDougall said. “As such, I wholeheartedly and without reservation endorse the candidacy of Bill Owens.”

“As a life-long labor activist, I know that Bill Owens understands the issues important to working people. On the other hand, Doug Hoffman has little regard for the interests of workers.”

“Hoffman’s opposition to the Employee Free Choice Act, coupled with his support for the failed policies of the Bush Administration make him a poor choice to serve the citizens of the 23rd Congressional District.”

I have to assume that when McDougall is referring to the failed policies of the Bush Administration, he’s not referring to the lack of spending restraint or the failure to adopt an effective counterinsurgency strategy in Iraq before 2006. Rather, McDougall’s believes that congressional Republicans would be best served by embracing the agenda of the hard labor left. This is an interesting view. While Scozzafava shouldn’t be held accountable for the views of her husband, one gets the impression that McDougall and Scozzafava are broadly in agreement.

Which makes the insistence on the part of E.J. Dionne and Frank Rich and other left-of-center observers that conservative critics of Scozzafava were attempting to purge a Republican moderate from the party seem more than a little peculiar. You’d almost think that the most politically useful narrative, rather than the most accurate narrative, was being advanced. But that’s not fair. In truth, Dionne and Rich and others believe that U.S. political discourse would be best served if conservatives embraced Scozzafava’s views, thus giving Democrats the freedom to move further to the left. This is an interesting view.

Hoffman, however, was not a flawless candidate. His lack of interest in key issues facing the 23rd congressional district was a serious liability, and the 2010 Republican nominee, whether it is Hoffman or Matthew Doheny or someone else, will have to have a stronger command of these issues. Had Hoffman won, it might have led to overconfidence and a raft of primary challengers who’d burn money conservatives could use more effectively elsewhere.

Meanwhile, the candidate who was most strikingly successful, Bob McDonnell, was a staunch conservative who focused on creating the right conditions for job growth. That sounds about right to me.

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Science & Tech

Set NASA Free

The Trump administration has proposed shifting the International Space Station from a NASA-exclusive research facility to a semi-public, semi-private one. Its plan would nix all government funding for the ISS by 2025 and award at least $150 million per year to NASA to help with the transition. This would be a ... Read More