Philip Swagel vs. the Break-Up-the-Banks Brigade

As a strong sympathizer with the break-up-the-banks brigade, I thought I’d share Philip Swagel’s case for the defense.

(1) Megabanks have the scale and the resources to do things that smaller banks simply can’t do, e.g., meet the needs of large global business enterprises and governments;

(2) though Dodd-Frank isn’t perfect, it represents significant progress in addressing too-big-to-fail, or too-interconnected-to-fail;

(3) and besides, the failure of a U.S. megabank wouldn’t cause as much disruption as is commonly understood as the assets of the five largest U.S. banks represent 56 percent of U.S. GDP, whereas the parallel numbers for Britain and Germany are 309 percent and 116 percent respectively;

(4) if anything, there might be less capital in the banking sector than we actually need to sustain robust growth;

(5) breaking up the megabanks will likely shift financial activities to foreign financial institutions subject to less stringent asset limits;

(6) shadow banks, less transparent and lightly regulated relative to the megabanks, will also pick up the slack, and this poses significant risks;

(7) indeed, it is the shadow banking sector that is in greater need of reform than the megabanks, as the most pressing issues relating to the latter have been more or less adequately addressed.

Though I’m not persuaded by Swagel’s argument, in part because there are a number of ways to achieve the broad goals of the break-up-the-banks brigade that also address at least some of his concerns, he makes a number of important points, particularly with regards to the shadow banking sector.  

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More