Because I agree with every word of Ramesh Ponnuru’s new New York Times op-ed, I’m reduced to quibbling with the title, which I’m guessing was not Ramesh’s doing. Frequent invocations of Ronald Reagan, for all his many virtues, make conservatives seem more nostalgic than forward-looking.

But on substance, Ramesh is dead on. Ronald Reagan’s economic prescriptions for 1980 reflected the economic conditions that prevailed in 1980, e.g., a federal income tax that proved burdensome for middle-income households, a top marginal tax rate of 70 percent, persistent high inflation, and price controls that dampened competition and innovation. Now, in contrast, it is the payroll tax that is the biggest burden for middle-income households, the top marginal tax rate is high but no so high that cutting it would guarantee a sharp increase in labor supply, onerous intellectual property rules threaten to cause economic “gridlock,” and the Fed has failed to keep nominal spending growing at a steady rate.

The conservative economic agenda I’d like to see would revolve around a few ideas, several of which Ramesh invokes in his article: (a) parents are investors in America’s future workforce, and they ought to be treated as such; (b) the main driver of sector-wide productivity growth is the constant churn of firms (the entry of innovative new firms, the exit of failing old firms) and the diffusion of ideas that accompany it, so reducing barriers to entry, including onerous intellectual property rules, should be a high priority; and (c) we need an economic environment that is conducive to “empowering” innovations, and not just “efficiency” innovations.

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More