A Quick Note on Average Market Incomes

A few days ago, I was reading “Redistribution Policy and Inequality Reduction in OECD Countries: What Has Changed in Two Decades” by Herwig Immervoll and Lisa Richardson, and I was struck by a chart on average market incomes for different income groups. It should go without saying that this isn’t a perfect measure — it is hard to find truly comparable data, and averaging all households in, say, the bottom quintile is not necessarily the most intuitive thing to do. Moreover, scholars tend to focus on post-tax, post-transfer incomes to give a better picture of how households are faring, i.e., how much disposable income they have to secure various goods and services, etc.

The chart uses an index. The earliest data point available is assigned 100, and numbers are given relative to 100 in later years. For Denmark, average market incomes for the bottom 20% deteriorated from 100 in the mid-1980s to 84 in the mid-2000s. Chile, remarkably, went from 100 in 1990 to 173 in the mid-2000s. Note that this comparison isn’t apples-to-apples, as the starting time periods are different.

For the top 20%, in contrast, the average market income for Danish households climbed from 100 in the mid-1980s to 130 in the mid-2000s. For Chile, the top 20% climbed from 100 in 1990 to 155 in the mid-2000s.

So how did the United States fare? Between the mid-1980s and the mid-2000s, average market incomes climbed to 111 for the bottom 20% and to 139 for the top 20%. Let me stress that we shouldn’t draw any sweeping conclusions, as the mid-2000s were the height of the housing boom, which provided employment for a large number of less-skilled men, including undocumented workers, etc. One assumes that there has been considerable backsliding in terms of average market income since then. And of course an average of the top 20% isn’t going to capture gains in market income at the top 1 or top 0.1 or 0.01 percent of the income distribution.

Regardless, I found these numbers interesting, as post-tax and post-transfer numbers tend to obscure a sense of the changing structure of underlying economic opportunity. In Denmark, for example, it is possible that market incomes have deteriorated as a larger number of less-skilled young men have gone on disability, etc. We’ve certainly seen a parallel development in the United States, and in the context of ex-offenders, etc. 

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More