The Surge Pricing Controversy

Recently, the social transit start-up Uber sparked a great deal of anger and resentment over its “surge pricing” strategy. To guarantee the availability of vehicles on demand, the service dramatically increases prices during periods of high demand, like New Year’s Eve, etc., in popular, dense cities. Uber has done a good job of explaining its reasoning, in my view. Either you use surge pricing or you simply tell customers that cars are not available even at a high price that at least some of them are willing to pay, which is really strange. Brendan Mulligan offers an alternative: he suggests that a clearer indication of what exactly surge pricing entails would help mitigate some of the frustration.

This minor dust-up serves as a reminder of the embeddedness of economic transactions. People feel as though Uber was taking advantage of them, despite the fact that the service leapt in to fill the void created by an overregulated taxi marketplace. One is reminded of Michael Munger’s critique of anti-gouging laws and, more broadly, his work on euvoluntary exchange.  

Relatedly, Munger links to a really thought-provoking essay by the democratic socialist philosopher Michael Walzer on the ethics of competition — it is one of the best critiques of market I’ve ever read, partly because it is so subtle and intelligent. Other critics of the market could learn a thing or two from Walzer. But they probably won’t. 

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More